Case study:Resilient River: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location

Revision as of 13:55, 9 May 2022

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 28' 19.87" N, 0° 28' 33.97" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://https://www.riverneneregionalpark.org/projects/resilient-river/
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Viktor
Main contact surname Tzikas
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://https://www.riverneneregionalpark.org
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


An initiative of the Nenescape Landscape Partnership the Resilient River project is funded by the Environment Agency & National Lottery Heritage Fund. The primary aim of the project is to enhance, restore and protect the backchannels and backwaters of the Nene Valley through efficient partnership working and best practice.

The River Nene has been highly modified for both flood defence and navigation purposes, historically for industry and in recent times for leisure. This has however, had an impact on the potential for the river to act as an aquatic habitat. The main river, where navigable is much less favourable habitat than the backchannels (historically the main river before modification) for fish, invertebrates & other flora and fauna.

The Resilient River project is in place to connect habitats along the Nene Valley by restoring neglected/altered features, to improve biodiversity; protect, enhance and interpret heritage features; and improve resilience of water quality and supply in the face of population growth, urbanisation and climate change.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Barnwell Backchannel Interpretation Panel
Hinge & Pinned Tree Barnwell
Natural Erosion Protection Barnwell
Volunteer tree planting Ailsworth
Whitemills Re-graded Banks Post works
Whitemills Re-graded Banks Pre works
Reinstated ford at Elton
Elton Ford Pre works
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Nene

Subcatchment

River name Nene
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 161161 m <br />0.161 km <br />16,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105032045300



Other case studies in this subcatchment: River Nene Nature Improvement Area


Site

Name River Nene
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Nene
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation EU - WFD protected area (drinking water, shellfish etc.)
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Gravel
River corridor land use Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 8800088,000 m <br />88 km <br />8,800,000 cm <br />
Project started 2017/09/01
Works started 2018/03/01
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources National Lottery Heritage Fund, Environment Agency, Environment Agency (Fisheries) Contribution of staff time (NWKCP

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 10 - 50 k€ 2121 k€ <br />21,000 € <br /> River Nene Regional Park
Stakeholder engagement and communication 1 - 10 k€ River Nene Regional Park
Works and works supervision 100 - 500 k€ River Nene Regional Park
Post-project management and maintenance 10 - 50 k€ River Nene Regional Park
Monitoring 10 - 50 k€ River Nene Regional Park



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Navigation
Biology
Physico-chemical Specific synthetic pollutants, Specific non-synthetic pollutants, Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Bank erosion, Floodplain Connectivity


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Introduction of gravel, Floating vegetated bank structures, Bank reprofiling, Sensitive desilt, Tree planting, Introducing large woody debris, Soft erosion solutions
Floodplain / River corridor Livestock fencing
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Interpretation boards, interacting with farmers
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information