Case study:Wyndham Park, Grantham

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 55' 5.49" N, 0° 38' 20.14" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Spatial planning, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Matt
Main contact surname Parr
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations South Kesteven District Council
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Upper Witham Restoration

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project after completition

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The 2016 Grantham Urban Rivers and Wetlands Plan, launched in 2016, identified numerous opportunities for river habitat improvements through the town, and Wyndham Park was selected as a pilot project to demonstrate the benefits of urban river restoration to the people of Grantham and to show that projects like this, when carefully designed, do not increase flood risk.

The overall objectives of the Wyndham scheme were to improve the flow, reduce sedimentation and create habitats for river life, including native brown trout and white-clawed crayfish, as wells as insect pollinators. A narrower, more sinuous, 2-stage channel would increase the flow and reduce the accumulation of fine sediment on the river bed.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Trout Redd surveying of the gravels have been very positive with good numbers observed on the gravels installed.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


In August 2017 the flood resilience of the project was immediately demonstrated when heavy overnight rain caused the river to rise and temporarily flood the berms. Soon after completion chub were observed on the fresh gravel bed and in winter 2017/18 brown trout redds (spawning scrapes) were located. The access berm was an immediate success and provided the venue for river studies at the World Rivers Day event in September 2017.


Image gallery


Newly installed berm
Access Platform being used
Newly added gravels
High flow event post completion of works.
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Witham

Subcatchment

River name Upper Witham
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 4646 m <br />0.046 km <br />4,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105030056760



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Aubourn Rock Ramp and Habitat Works, Belton Floodplain Reconnection and River Restoration, Dysart Park, Grantham Habitat Improvement, Grantham Blue Green - Urban Reach, Little Ponton, Manthorpe Floodplain Reconnection, Papermill Weir Section in-channel restoration, River Witham Great Ponton, Stainby Road, Colsterworth, Syston and Barkston Restoration... further results


Site

Name Wyndham Park Grantham
WFD water body codes GB105030056780
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Witham - confluence of Cringle Brook to confluence Brant
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Native Crayfish / Brown Trout
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 7070 m <br />0.07 km <br />7,000 cm <br />
Project started 01/06/2017
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 7600076,000 k€ <br />76,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood Risk
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Phosphate
Other reasons for the project Improving Local Park


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Adding Gravel, Berm Creation, tree management
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Public access to river
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtZikLDHlP0 YouTube video of the overall project

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information