Case study:Source to Sea Programme – 3. Upper Wenning Restoration

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 6' 5.73" N, 2° 23' 43.80" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.riverconservation.org.uk/source-to-sea-s2s-the-perfect-partnership
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Sarah
Main contact surname Littlefield
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Lune Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.riverconservation.org.uk/
Partner organisations Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Cumbria Woodlands, Lune Rivers Trust, Morecambe Bay Partnership, Arnside & Silverdale AONB Partnership, RSPB, South Cumbria Rivers Trust
Parent multi-site project

Case study:Source to Sea Programme

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Austwick Beck - new fencing protecting bank

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


River Wenning is a tributary of the River Lune, and is one of the best sea trout rivers in the country. In recent years sea trout catches have been inexplicably low off Scottish and Irish coasts, which are now believed to be mirrored in the River Wenning numbers.

The Upper River Wenning and most of its tributaries have been extensively modified over the course of the last 150 years and all have lost much of their natural character. Their ability to support sea trout, salmon, brown trout, and many other species of wildlife (otter, kingfisher, dipper etc.) has been compromised. Some of the issues leading to this decline together with remedial actions are: • Natural meanders have gone and been replaced by straight, featureless sections that resemble muddy field drains; • In the same areas it is clear that the river has been dredged as much of the natural bed has been dug out and been piled up on the banks. As a consequence the gravel depth is shallow and salmonids struggle to find suitable locations to breed; and • Almost all bankside vegetation has gone and what was once a key salmonid nursery area for both the Wenning and the Lune has been sacrificed for land drainage to improve farm yield.

This project is designed to raise the WFD classification of the Upper Wenning tributaries, (all currently “moderate”) to good and hence raise the classification of the Upper Wenning itself from moderate to good. The work includes buffer-stripping to reduce diffuse pollution (Fen Beck, Crook Beck, Clapham Beck, Austwick Beck, Keasden Beck and the Wenning) and the removal of a manmade weir on Kettles Beck to open access of 5 miles to migratory fish. It also includes tree planting on Clapham Beck and the creation of spawning side channels on Keasden Beck.

Community Involvement - Engagement activities will include practical volunteering activities like tree planting, and awareness-raising through media and face-to-face contact.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Crook Beck - Environment Agency inspecting new fences - where none had been before
River Wenning - new fencing protecting eroding banks
Austwick Beck - new infrastructure where there had been none.
Clapham Beck - new fencing now protecting riparian strip
Keasden Beck - ghylls fenced off
Keasden Beck - river valley fenced - prior to tree planting
Keasden Beck - new fencing - stock excluded from riparian area.
Fenn Beck and Kettles Beck - new fencing installed
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Upper River Wenning
WFD water body codes GB112072066030, GB112072066060, GB112072066070, GB112072066080, GB112072066090, GB112072066100, GB112072071840
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Keasden Beck, River Wenning, Kettles Beck, Fen Beck, Fen Beck, Austwick Beck, Clapham Beck
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/06/28
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 13501,350 k€ <br />1,350,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Diffuse pollution
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Tree planting, Barrier removal
Floodplain / River corridor Fencing of riparian zone, Riparian planting
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Media
Other Practical volunteering activities, Community engagement


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents






Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information