Case study:Sculthorpe Moor Restoration Scheme

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 49' 58.62" N, 0° 48' 52.32" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Adam
Main contact surname Thurtle
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Wensum River Restoration Strategy

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Restored section of Wensum at Sculthorpe Moor

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


A sustainable solution was used to improve a silted gravel bed by narrowing the channel using berms, woody debris and pinned willow. This will help to constrict the over-wide channel, increasing water velocity and helping to keep the gravel bed exposed which should provide ideal spawning habitat for trout and an assortment of invertebrates and aquatic plants that depend on a clean gravel substrate.

Large spoil embankments, a remnant of past dredging activities, occur along much of the reach. These have been selectively removed on the southern bank, to improve floodplain connectivity. The result, floodplain wetting during periods of high flow, provides multiple benefits. Floodplain biodiversity is improved, sediment is removed from the channel and flood risk to people and property in Fakenham and further downstream is reduced.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Learning from previous experiences of restoring other sites led the project team away from a prescriptive design solution. Instead they relied on the skills and expertise of the North Norfolk Operations Field Team, to determine the finer detail based on how the river reacts to restoration features as they were constructed. The team were able to incorporate locally available materials such as timber from selective tree management, and re-use spoil banks from historical dredging of the channel.

This flexible approach used fewer resources and saves money by reducing the amount of material needing to be imported. It was a big advantage in Sculthorpe, where ground conditions for machine access were challenging.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Broadland Rivers

Subcatchment

River name Wensum US Norwich
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 9898 m <br />0.098 km <br />9,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105034055881



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Great Ryburgh End Restoration Scheme, Meander reinstatement on the River Wensum at the Ryburgh Loop, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 10 Lenwade, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 3a Costessey, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 9 Attlebridge, River rehabilitation on the River Wensum at Swanton Morley, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Pensthorpe


Site

Name Sculthope Moor
WFD water body codes GB105034055881
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Wensum US Norwich
Pre-project morphology Over-widened
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Low gradient passively meandering
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started 2013/11/04
Works completed 2013/11/29
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Environment Agency
Stakeholder engagement and communication Environment Agency
Works and works supervision North Norfolk Operations Field Team
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Substrate conditions, Width & depth variation, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of berms, Introducing large woody debris
Floodplain / River corridor Floodplain reconnection, Removal of embankments
Planform / Channel pattern Channel narrowing
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information