Case study:Manthorpe Floodplain Reconnection

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 52° 55' 44.86" N, 0° 37' 44.24" W

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Manthorpe Floodplain Reconnection\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Habitat and biodiversity\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Manthorpe Floodplain Reconnection","link":"","lat":52.92912864242,"lon":-0.62895530967159,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country	England
Main contact forename	Matt
Main contact surname	Parr
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site	http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations	Wild Trout Trust, Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust.
Parent multi-site project	Case_study:Upper Witham Restoration
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Project after completion.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

This project was jointly undertaken by the Wild Trout Trust and Environment Agency.

There were five components to the scheme:

• Removal of redundant flood bank, and lowering of the floodplain to create a terraced floodplain with a lower more frequently connected floodplain and a higher terrace of un-lowered floodplain. This gives maximum

benefit to the river and natural processes whilst providing some variation in flood event storage and habitat evolution and variety.

• Addition of riffles and gravel supply in the form of point bars and islands and splitting of channel into multiple threads creating a more natural form and allowing the river space to adjust to changes in flow but also allow natural processes like silt deposition, channel evolution, less intensive management, woody material to be retained in channel and on flood plain. The gravel raises the bed helping to connect the river into the floodplain reducing the amount of spoil generated to lower floodplain as well as providing rich habitats for riverine wildlife.
• Creation of floodplain ponds and terrestrial habitat features like habitat piles, stone piles for hibernacular, and woody material on the floodplain to encourage further hydraulic roughness in high flow events
• Spreading of spoil over the top of the valley sides outside of the floodplain, this was then reseeded with appropriate wildflower grassland mix and provides pollinator benefits.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.

Brown trout have already been observed spawning on the new limestone gravels. Crayfish monitoring was carried out pre works and showed a very low baseline population with only 6 individuals caught, repeat monitoring of this will be carried out along with repeat bird surveys of the site.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.

4200m3 of earth was removed from the floodplain during the lowering and removal of embankments. Reconnecting the floodplain has created 19,500m3 of space for water which now reconnects to the lower floodplain frequently after intense rainfall events at a 1 in 2 event magnitude.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

New channel evolving.

Wet floodplain in winter.

Catchment and subcatchment Select a catchment/subcatchment Edit the catchment and subcatchment details (affects all case studies in this subcatchment) Catchment River basin district Anglian River basin Witham Subcatchment River name Upper Witham Area category 10 - 100 km² Area (km2) Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m Maximum altitude (m) 4646 m <br />0.046 km <br />4,600 cm <br /> Dominant geology Calcareous Ecoregion Great Britain Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture Waterbody ID GB105030056760 Other case studies in this subcatchment: Aubourn Rock Ramp and Habitat Works, Belton Floodplain Reconnection and River Restoration, Dysart Park, Grantham Habitat Improvement, Grantham Blue Green - Urban Reach, Little Ponton, Papermill Weir Section in-channel restoration, River Witham Great Ponton, Stainby Road, Colsterworth, Syston and Barkston Restoration, Upper Cringle Floodplain Restoration Project... further results Site Edit site Name Manthorpe Floodplain Reconnection WFD water body codes GB105030056780 WFD (national) typology WFD water body name Witham - confluence of Cringle Brook to confluence Brant Pre-project morphology Reference morphology Desired post project morphology Heavily modified water body No National/international site designation Local/regional site designations Protected species present Yes Invasive species present No Species of interest Native Crayfish / Brown Trout Dominant hydrology Dominant substrate River corridor land use Average bankfull channel width category Average bankfull channel width (m) Average bankfull channel depth category Average bankfull channel depth (m) Mean discharge category Mean annual discharge (m3/s) Average channel gradient category Average channel gradient Average unit stream power (W/m2) Project background Edit project background Reach length directly affected (m) 325325 m <br />0.325 km <br />32,500 cm <br /> Project started Works started Works completed Project completed Total cost category 100 - 500 k€ Total cost (k€) 229229 k€ <br />229,000 € <br /> Benefit to cost ratio Funding sources EA Cost for project phases Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname Investigation and design Environement Agency Matt Parr Stakeholder engagement and communication Works and works supervision Wild Trout Trust Rob Mungovan Post-project management and maintenance Monitoring Reasons for river restoration Edit reasons for restoration Mitigation of a pressure Land Drainage Hydromorphology Biology Fish Physico-chemical Phosphate Other reasons for the project Measures Edit Measures Structural measures Bank/bed modifications Channel modification, Gravel added, Tree Hinging Floodplain / River corridor Redundant Flood Bank Removed, Floodplain Lowered, Floodplain Roughened, Ponds added. Planform / Channel pattern Multiple channels added Other Wild Flower Meadow area created. Non-structural measures Management interventions Social measures (incl. engagement) Other Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents Case Study Manthorpe Restoration.pdf Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtZikLDHlP0 Manthorpe Video Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information