Case study:River Wensum Restoration, Reach 10 Lenwade

From RESTORE
Revision as of 08:51, 28 April 2023 by Ascarr (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 43' 29.97" N, 1° 7' 10.46" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Amy
Main contact surname Butcher
Main contact user ID User:Amy.butcher
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/environment-agency
Partner organisations Natural England
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Wensum River Restoration Strategy

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Reach 10 of the River Wensum Restoration Strategy involved restoring 1.3km of SSSI & SAC designated river at Lenwade, west of Norwich, Norfolk. Improvements to morphological diversity were achieved here through the installation of woody material features, bank stabilisation, hinging willow trees and re-engineering the existing gravel bed to create riffles and pools. Selective tree felling also took place to allow light into a heavily shaded area of the channel.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Analysis of monitoring results pending.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Access was very limited due to the presences of fishing lakes adjacent to the river. Most works had to be completed by hand. Some work was carried out by amphibious excavator where the benefits outweighed the potential damage to the gravel bed from the excavator tracks.

Additional tree works were required due to periods of high winds and the need to make the area safe for construction work to be carried out. Re-profiled river banks with bare soil were exposed during high flows and could have lead to erosion and sediment input. Seeding and the installation of a biodegradable jute matting was carried out to minimise erosion.

(This had not been anticipated in the design. Ideally work would be carried out early enough to allow bank vegetation to re-establish from the existing seed bank.)


Image gallery


LenwadeRiverBedWorks.JPG
LenwadeBankWorks.JPG
LenwadeDeflector.JPG
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Broadland Rivers

Subcatchment

River name Wensum US Norwich
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 9898 m <br />0.098 km <br />9,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105034055881



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Great Ryburgh End Restoration Scheme, Meander reinstatement on the River Wensum at the Ryburgh Loop, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 3a Costessey, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 9 Attlebridge, River rehabilitation on the River Wensum at Swanton Morley, Sculthorpe Moor Restoration Scheme, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Pensthorpe


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation, Flow velocities
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank reprofiling, Bank stabilisation, Bed reprofiling
Floodplain / River corridor Tree management
Planform / Channel pattern Brushwood berms to increase scour on the gravels, Introducing large woody debris
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information