Case study:River Wensum Restoration, Reach 3a Costessey

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:51, 14 October 2020 by Amy.butcher (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 39' 58.73" N, 1° 12' 8.73" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Amy
Main contact surname Butcher
Main contact user ID User:Amy.butcher
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/environment-agency
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Wensum River Restoration Strategy

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Reach 3a of the River Wensum Restoration Strategy involved restoring 1.2km of SSSI & SAC designated river at Costessey, west of Norwich, Norfolk. Improvements to morphological diversity were achieved here through the installation of gravel glides, pools and berms and woody material. Informal cattle drinks were enhanced to reduce poaching and sediment input whilst still providing water to the landowner's livestock. These cattle drinks also acted as fry bays whilst fields were not being grazed. Tree planting was also carried out in exposed stretches of the river.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Analysis of monitoring results pending. Post-restoration water vole surveys suggest that fenced tree enclosures which were no longer grazed provided additional habitat for water voles. Field signs (latrines and food stores) were observed in areas where they hadn't previously been seen.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Natural un-milled and untreated timber for use as woody material was difficult to source at this location. Sourcing material for future schemes needs to be a consideration in the design. After an exceptionally dry summer the river level had dropped such that the fenced cattle drinks no longer allowed livestock to reach the water to drink (see photos). The scheme also included un-fenced drinks which the livestock could use. Consideration for livestock watering provisions in the event of low water levels must be included in future designs.


Image gallery


CostesseyBerms.JPG
CostesseyBerms2.JPG
FencedCattleDrink.JPG
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Broadland Rivers

Subcatchment

River name Wensum US Norwich
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 9898 m <br />0.098 km <br />9,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105034055881



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Great Ryburgh End Restoration Scheme, Meander reinstatement on the River Wensum at the Ryburgh Loop, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 10 Lenwade, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 9 Attlebridge, River rehabilitation on the River Wensum at Swanton Morley, Sculthorpe Moor Restoration Scheme, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Pensthorpe


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 12001,200 m <br />1.2 km <br />120,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 10 - 50 k€ Environment Agency
Stakeholder engagement and communication 1 - 10 k€ Environment Agency
Works and works supervision 100 - 500 k€ Environment Agency
Post-project management and maintenance 1 - 10 k€ Environment Agency
Monitoring 1 - 10 k€ Environment Agency



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation, Flow velocities
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of gravel deflectors, Gravel berms, Re-introducing gravel
Floodplain / River corridor Tree planting
Planform / Channel pattern Introducing large woody debris
Other Cattle drinks, fry bays
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information