Case study:River Witham Great Ponton: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=upper witham
|Subcatchment=Upper Witham
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site

Revision as of 12:04, 27 February 2024

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 51' 32.39" N, 0° 37' 4.63" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Matt
Main contact surname Parr
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Wild Trout Trust and Grantham Angling Association Fly Fishing Section
Parent multi-site project

Upper Witham Restoration

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
By-pass channel under construction.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Channel narrowing and flow deflection to create flow variation and beneficial bed scour using a variety of techniques: log flow deflectors (vanes), open and enclosed log/faggot and brushwood mattresses (silt-traps); increasing in-stream woody habitat by securing existing deadwood and hinging and pinning (layering) live riverside trees; creation of sections of 2-stage channel and enhancing marginal wetland habitat by excavating of bays/berms; and the reduction of sediment inputs by ford refurbishment and riverside fencing. The final phase involved major works to restore a section of the river to a more natural planform.

Project Objectives The initial downstream phases were primarily designed to

Stabilise eroding river banks to reduce sediment inputs caused by fluvial processes and livestock.
Trap mobile fine sediments already in the river.
Improve conveyance during higher flows and reduce flood risk.
Improve in-stream habitats for fish and invertebrates, including white-clawed crayfish.

The final phase, at Grange Farm, set out to restore a degraded section of the river to its original course, such that the naturalised section of river would function in an ecologically and geomorphologically improved form.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


For all phases, visual inspections and regular fixed-point photographs are being undertaken to monitor the integrity and performance of the enhancement works and record any changes they are making to river morphology. Specific to Phase 2, modifications to the channel profile as a result of the woody material introduction upstream of Dunkirk Cottage can be determined by comparison with a baseline cross-section in this location and the effects on turbidity and invertebrate populations will also be monitored here. For phase 3, in addition to an annual redd (trout spawning “nest”) survey of the new riffles, the established annual fish monitoring downstream of Easton Walled Garden and invertebrate sampling at Easton Lane Bridge will be used to detect any changes as a result of the works.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The importance of gravel and floodplain connectivity to drive significant change. Need for wood in by-pass channel. Where the constraints have been addressed by realigning and re-naturalising the channel at Grange Farm, habitat improvement has been more successful, although further intervention is required. Introduced gravel has been displaced in high flows and needs to be replaced with larger calibre material which will remain stable and restore the designed pool-riffle sequence. The abrupt change in valley floor gradient at this site constrained the design of the new channel and caused this situation; this is unusual and should not be a deterrent to similar river restoration schemes elsewhere.


Image gallery


Ponton 2.png
Ponton 3.png
Ponton 4.png
Ponton 5.png
Ponton 6.png
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Witham

Subcatchment

River name Upper Witham
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 4646 m <br />0.046 km <br />4,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105030056760



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Aubourn Rock Ramp and Habitat Works, Belton Floodplain Reconnection and River Restoration, Dysart Park, Grantham Habitat Improvement, Grantham Blue Green - Urban Reach, Little Ponton, Manthorpe Floodplain Reconnection, Papermill Weir Section in-channel restoration, Stainby Road, Colsterworth, Syston and Barkston Restoration, Upper Cringle Floodplain Restoration Project... further results


Site

Name River Witham Great Ponton
WFD water body codes GB105030051570
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Upper Witham Headwater to confluence Cringle Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 2.72.7 m <br />0.0027 km <br />270 cm <br />
Project started 01/02/2013
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 141141 k€ <br />141,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources EA

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Land Drainage
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Phosphates
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Tree Hinging, Faggot Mattresses, Flow Deflectors
Floodplain / River corridor Fencing, cattle access points
Planform / Channel pattern Weir Bypass, new meandering channel planform
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information