Case study:Sculthorpe Moor Restoration Scheme: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Sculthope Moor | |Name=Sculthope Moor | ||
|WFD water body code=GB105034055881 | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Over-widened, | |Pre-project morphology=Over-widened, | ||
|Desired post project morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, | |Desired post project morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |Heavily modified water body=Yes | ||
|Site designation=UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest | |Site designation=UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest |
Revision as of 11:02, 1 September 2015
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Adam |
Main contact surname | Thurtle |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
A sustainable solution was used to improve a silted gravel bed by narrowing the channel using berms, woody debris and pinned willow. This will help to constrict the over-wide channel, increasing water velocity and helping to keep the gravel bed exposed which should provide ideal spawning habitat for trout and an assortment of invertebrates and aquatic plants that depend on a clean gravel substrate.
Large spoil embankments, a remnant of past dredging activities, occur along much of the reach. These have been selectively removed on the southern bank, to improve floodplain connectivity. The result, floodplain wetting during periods of high flow, provides multiple benefits. Floodplain biodiversity is improved, sediment is removed from the channel and flood risk to people and property in Fakenham and further downstream is reduced.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Learning from previous experiences of restoring other sites led the project team away from a prescriptive design solution. Instead they relied on the skills and expertise of the North Norfolk Operations Field Team, to determine the finer detail based on how the river reacts to restoration features as they were constructed. The team were able to incorporate locally available materials such as timber from selective tree management, and re-use spoil banks from historical dredging of the channel.
This flexible approach used fewer resources and saves money by reducing the amount of material needing to be imported. It was a big advantage in Sculthorpe, where ground conditions for machine access were challenging.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Great Ryburgh End Restoration Scheme, Meander reinstatement on the River Wensum at the Ryburgh Loop, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 10 Lenwade, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 3a Costessey, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 9 Attlebridge, River rehabilitation on the River Wensum at Swanton Morley, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Wensum River Restoration and Floodplain Enhancement, Pensthorpe
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|