Case study:The Pow Beck Improvement Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
|Caption=SCIMAP erosion risk
|Caption=SCIMAP erosion risk
}}
}}
 
{{Case study image
 
|File name=River Bank Before Work - June.JPG
|Caption=Before installation of woody debris
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=River Bank After Work - July.JPG
}}





Revision as of 13:00, 15 July 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 49' 21.04" N, 2° 55' 38.74" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Will
Main contact surname Cleasby
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Eden Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.edenriverstrust.org.uk/
Partner organisations Environment Agency, DEFRA, Catchment Sensitive Farming, NFU, DairyCo
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Soil husbandry workshops in the Pow Beck catchment

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Work on the Pow Beck will revolve around mitigation of diffuse agricultural pollution, more specifically nutrient and sediment loss from the farming system. The first phase of the project will be based around engaging the farming community on the Pow Beck and providing a range of workshops that inform them about diffuse pollution and the work that can be done to address it through the project.

The project will then seek to address issues through a number of methods working in conjunction with the farm business. The work involved includes improving farm infrastructure or installing riverbank fencing and planting trees. The project is also changing the working practices of businesses in the area by using GPS equipment to improve the accuracy of fertiliser spreading and offering machinery to help reduce the amount of soil compaction. The project therefore aims to take a whole farm approach to diffuse pollution reduction.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC) project will carry out monitoring of stream water quality and biology. This includes monitoring nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and water volume. Additionally before and after photographs will be taken of project sites and electrofishing surveys take place within the catchment.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Pow Beck fencing and tree planting
GPS equipment
Drain tracing to inform infrastructure improvement
Fencing
SCIMAP erosion risk
Before installation of woody debris
River Bank After Work - July.JPG


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Solway Tweed
River basin Eden and Esk

Subcatchment

River name Pow Beck (Eden and Esk)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 155155 m <br />0.155 km <br />15,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Grassland
Waterbody ID GB102076073780



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident, Riparian development
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Farm infrastructure interventions
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Non/agricultural business changed its way of working
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement
Other Economic benefits


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information