Case study:Source to Sea Programme – 9. Kent, Leven and Duddon Estuaries beach cleans and volunteer ambassadors: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Blocking of certain grips, Tree planting  
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Blocking of certain grips, Tree planting
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetlands, Removal of the obstruction for fish passage  
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Removal of the obstruction for fish passage
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Engagement activities will include public consultations, practical volunteering activities like beach cleans, and tree planting, and awareness-raising through media and face-to-face contact.  
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Engagement activities will include public consultations, practical volunteering activities like beach cleans, and tree planting, and awareness-raising through media and face-to-face contact.
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

Revision as of 09:40, 1 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 10' 12.37" N, 2° 54' 33.04" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://lovemybeach.org/groups/morecambe-bay/
Themes Economic aspects, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Emma
Main contact surname McColm
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Morecambe Bay Partnership
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.morecambebay.org.uk/
Partner organisations RSPB, Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Cumbria Woodlands, Lune Rivers Trust, Morecambe Bay Partnership, Arnside & Silverdale AONB Partnership, South Cumbria Rivers Trust
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Source to Sea Programme

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Marine litter on North Walney beach

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Significant areas of the Kent, Duddon, and Leven estuaries currently fail to achieve even moderate WFD status, predominantly due to water quality for shellfish. Discarded rubbish and plastics are also significant problems in these areas. There is poor public awareness of the issues affecting our estuaries.

This project will build awareness of the issues and build volunteer capacity. Volunteer teams led and hosted by Morecambe Bay Partnership will carry out beach cleans removing litter, especially plastics. The project will focus on coastal sections of the Bay that are currently failing. Additional training will be supported so we develop a network of volunteer champions/ ambassadors who will communicate constructive message with the press and with their local communities, raising awareness of water quality issues and able to highlight actions to address these.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Morecambe Bay
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district North West
River basin Lune

Subcatchment

River name LUNE
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID GB531207212100



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Source to Sea Programme


Site

Name Duddon catchments
WFD water body codes GB531207212100
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name LUNE
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/06/28
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 13501,350 k€ <br />1,350,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident
Hydromorphology Structure & condition of intertidal zone
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Specific synthetic pollutants, Specific non-synthetic pollutants
Other reasons for the project Community awareness


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Blocking of certain grips, Tree planting
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetland, Removal of the obstruction for fish passage
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Engagement activities will include public consultations, practical volunteering activities like beach cleans, and tree planting, and awareness-raising through media and face-to-face contact.


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information