Case study:Albany Park: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
|Location=51.6680259704589, -0.0293126590549946
|Location=51.6682925025019, -0.03331565864322039
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Planned
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Urban
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Urban
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=John
|Main contact forename=Matilda
|Main contact surname=Bryden
|Main contact surname=Biddulph
|Main contact id=mbiddulph
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
|Partner organisations=London Borough of Enfield,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=To re-establish natural geomorphological features within the Turkey Brook, including the creation of natural in-stream features, natural banks, wet berms, backwaters, fringing reed beds, emergent and aquatic vegetation and potentially wetland scrapes.<br>
|Project picture=Albany Park Before and After.png
Natural Habitat creation with a focus towards habitat for fish, water voles and otters, also would have benefits for flood risk management, improved amenity and recreation and access to nature. Currently the Park is extremely low quality and the restoration of the river would significantly improve the facilities the park provides for local people. This park will be looked at by the Urban Pioneers (a project run by the Architecture Foundation), who will look at ways to improve the whole park as well as restoring the river.
|Picture description=Left: pre-restoration concrete channel Right: post-restoration sinuous, natural channel.
|Project summary=A partnership project between London Borough of Enfield (LBE) and the Environment Agency (EA; Biodiversity & Geomorphology team from Hertfordshire and North London Area). Funded by LBE, EA and the Greater London Authority (GLA). The environmental and flood risk benefits allowed for funding, and the project came to approximately £1.5million.
 
The Turkey Brook is a medium sized, clay-based catchment flowing initially through rural grassland into a dense urban area of London, before meeting the River Lee in Enfield. It is failing under the Water Framework Directive for: macrophytes and phytobenthos, phosphate, and drought/low flows, and hydromorphology. The river was confined in a steep sided concrete channel along the edge of the park, with very little biodiversity, habitat or connection with groundwater. The general public often did not even know it was there, or if they did they regarded it as an open sewer.
 
The Albany Park Restoration Project aimed to restore 400m of the Turkey Brook, by breaking it out of concrete and creating a natural, sinuous river through the park. The river now flows through a wide, shallow river corridor made up primarily of the Kempton Park Gravel Member, which allows the channel to reform and reshape itself during high flows until it reaches an equilibrium. The urban, flashy nature of the catchment means that intensive geomorphological work is achieved during each high flow event.
 
The river is now connected laterally with it's floodplain and riparian zone, and vertically with the groundwater and a hyporheic zone. The natural cross section and improved connectivity has improved the Turkey Brook's resilience to low flows, and its ability to store water and attenuate high flows. The constructed wetlands and SuDs features around the park has hopefully also improved water quality, but ongoing monitoring will determine the success of this.
 
The river is now a valuable public amenity in an otherwise heavily urban area, and provides an educational resource for local schools.
|Monitoring surveys and results=As the project was completed in the Summer of 2021, monitoring is still on going. Invertebrates, macrophytes, fish and water quality will be monitored before and after for a number of years, alongside morph surveys with accompanying drone footages to show the change in channel shape over time.
|Lessons learn=The project was severely delayed due to a combination of Covid-19 and wet weather, there were also issues with securing planning permission due to the large number of stakeholders involved.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P03 Albany drone during construction.jpg
|Caption=Drone Photograph during early phase of construction
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=P04 Albany downstream river breakthrough (looking upstream).JPG
|Caption=Breaking back into Turkey Brook at the downstream end, looking upstream.
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Pre-Restoration.jpeg
|Caption=The confined concrete channel pre-restoration.
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=During construction.jpeg
|Caption=During construction. Note the extremely gravelly ground through which the channel was created.
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Post restoration.jpeg
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Site}}
|Subcatchment=Cuffley Brook and Turkey Brook
{{Project background}}
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Site
{{Measures}}
|WFD water body code=GB106038033180
|WFD water body name=Cuffley Brook and Turkey Brook
|Heavily modified water body=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
}}
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=400
|Project started=01/04/2016
|Works started=2020/08/01
|Works completed=2021/08/01
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€
|Funding sources=Local council, Greater London Authority, Environment Agency environmental funding and flood risk funding.
}}
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=Urbanisation,
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform,
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Invertebrates, Macrophytes,
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations,
|Other motivation=improving a local park
}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Creation of berms, Creation of backwaters,
|Floodplain / River corridor=River naturalisation, Reedbed creation, Scrapes, Fish habitat restoration,
|Social measures=Recreation,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
Line 37: Line 94:
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
|File name=1._Albany_Park_River_Restoration_Project_Summary.pdf
|Description=picture summary
}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}

Latest revision as of 09:40, 28 July 2022

5.00
(2 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 40' 5.85" N, 0° 1' 59.94" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Matilda
Main contact surname Biddulph
Main contact user ID User:mbiddulph
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations London Borough of Enfield
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Left: pre-restoration concrete channel Right: post-restoration sinuous, natural channel.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


A partnership project between London Borough of Enfield (LBE) and the Environment Agency (EA; Biodiversity & Geomorphology team from Hertfordshire and North London Area). Funded by LBE, EA and the Greater London Authority (GLA). The environmental and flood risk benefits allowed for funding, and the project came to approximately £1.5million.

The Turkey Brook is a medium sized, clay-based catchment flowing initially through rural grassland into a dense urban area of London, before meeting the River Lee in Enfield. It is failing under the Water Framework Directive for: macrophytes and phytobenthos, phosphate, and drought/low flows, and hydromorphology. The river was confined in a steep sided concrete channel along the edge of the park, with very little biodiversity, habitat or connection with groundwater. The general public often did not even know it was there, or if they did they regarded it as an open sewer.

The Albany Park Restoration Project aimed to restore 400m of the Turkey Brook, by breaking it out of concrete and creating a natural, sinuous river through the park. The river now flows through a wide, shallow river corridor made up primarily of the Kempton Park Gravel Member, which allows the channel to reform and reshape itself during high flows until it reaches an equilibrium. The urban, flashy nature of the catchment means that intensive geomorphological work is achieved during each high flow event.

The river is now connected laterally with it's floodplain and riparian zone, and vertically with the groundwater and a hyporheic zone. The natural cross section and improved connectivity has improved the Turkey Brook's resilience to low flows, and its ability to store water and attenuate high flows. The constructed wetlands and SuDs features around the park has hopefully also improved water quality, but ongoing monitoring will determine the success of this.

The river is now a valuable public amenity in an otherwise heavily urban area, and provides an educational resource for local schools.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


As the project was completed in the Summer of 2021, monitoring is still on going. Invertebrates, macrophytes, fish and water quality will be monitored before and after for a number of years, alongside morph surveys with accompanying drone footages to show the change in channel shape over time.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The project was severely delayed due to a combination of Covid-19 and wet weather, there were also issues with securing planning permission due to the large number of stakeholders involved.


Image gallery


Drone Photograph during early phase of construction
Breaking back into Turkey Brook at the downstream end, looking upstream.
The confined concrete channel pre-restoration.
During construction. Note the extremely gravelly ground through which the channel was created.
Post restoration.jpeg
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Cuffley Brook and Turkey Brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 143143 m <br />0.143 km <br />14,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology Clay
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB106038033180



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106038033180
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Cuffley Brook and Turkey Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 400400 m <br />0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Project started 01/04/2016
Works started 2020/08/01
Works completed 2021/08/01
Project completed
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Local council, Greater London Authority, Environment Agency environmental funding and flood risk funding.

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Urbanisation
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform
Biology Fish, Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project improving a local park


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of berms, Creation of backwaters
Floodplain / River corridor River naturalisation, Reedbed creation, Scrapes, Fish habitat restoration
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Recreation
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information