Case study:Upper Welland Water Friendly Farming Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=In progress
|Status=Complete
|Project web site url=www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/33_waterfriendlyfarming.pdf
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
|Country=England
|Country=England
Line 12: Line 13:
|Main contact surname=Stoate
|Main contact surname=Stoate
|Contact organisation=Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
|Contact organisation=Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
|Partner organisations=Pond Conservation, York University, Oxford Brookes University, Sheffield University, Syngenta, Welland Rivers Trust, Anglian Water, Freshwater Habitats Trust, Environment Agency, Defra, Welland Rivers Trust, Welland Rivers Partnership
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=3-6SiltTrap.JPG
|Project picture=3-6SiltTrap.JPG
Line 25: Line 27:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|WFD water body code=GB105031050550
   
|WFD water body name=Eye Brook
   
|Heavily modified water body=No
     
|Protected species present=No
|WFD water body code=
|Invasive species present=No
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background
|Project started=2012/07/01
|Project started=2012/07/01
|Project completed=2015/03/01
|Project completed=2015/03/01
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€
|Total1 cost=1,220
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 16:12, 5 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 38' 16.55" N, 0° 55' 12.77" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/33_waterfriendlyfarming.pdf
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Chris
Main contact surname Stoate
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Pond Conservation, York University, Oxford Brookes University, Sheffield University, Syngenta, Welland Rivers Trust, Anglian Water, Freshwater Habitats Trust, Environment Agency, Defra, Welland Rivers Trust, Welland Rivers Partnership
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Sediment accumulation behind a WFF project ditch dam (Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Water Friendly Farming Project is a multi-partner national demonstration conceived by Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust and Pond Conservation. It seeks to deliver catchment scale benefits to the rural water environment, together with new information about the practical effectiveness of the measures employed in the predominantly agricultural landscape. The project focuses on three 10 km2 upper catchments, and employs a Control, Impact, Before, After (BACI) approach, where two of the three catchments will receive mitigation measures, the third will act as a control.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Welland

Subcatchment

River name Eye Brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 226226 m <br />0.226 km <br />22,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105031050550



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB105031050550
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Eye Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/07/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/01
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 1,2201,220 k€ <br />1,220,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident
Hydromorphology
Biology Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Specific synthetic pollutants
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Reduce diffuse pollution
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Non BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information