Case study:Upper Welland Water Friendly Farming Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
   
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
|Location=
|Location=52.6379318237304, -0.920213162899017
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Complete
   
|Project web site url=www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/33_waterfriendlyfarming.pdf
   
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
      Complete
|Country=England
|Project web site url=
|Main contact forename=Chris
     
|Main contact surname=Stoate
|Themes=
|Contact organisation=Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
     
|Partner organisations=Pond Conservation, York University, Oxford Brookes University, Sheffield University, Syngenta, Welland Rivers Trust, Anglian Water, Freshwater Habitats Trust, Environment Agency, Defra, Welland Rivers Trust, Welland Rivers Partnership
|Country=
|Multi-site=No
      England
|Project picture=3-6SiltTrap.JPG
|Main contact forename=
|Picture description=Sediment accumulation behind a WFF project ditch dam (Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust)
      Chris
|Project summary=Water Friendly Farming Project is a multi-partner national demonstration conceived by Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust and Pond Conservation. It seeks to deliver catchment scale benefits to the rural water environment, together with new information about the practical effectiveness of the measures employed in the predominantly agricultural landscape. The project focuses on three 10 km2 upper catchments, and employs a Control, Impact, Before, After (BACI) approach, where two of the three catchments will receive mitigation measures, the third will act as a control.
|Main contact surname=
      Stoate
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}
Line 53: Line 23:
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_button}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Toggle_content_start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=Eye Brook
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|WFD water body code=GB105031050550
   
|WFD water body name=Eye Brook
   
|Heavily modified water body=No
     
|Protected species present=No
|WFD water body code=
|Invasive species present=No
     
|WFD (national) typology=
     
|WFD water body name=
     
|Pre-project morphology=
     
|Reference morphology=
     
|Heavily modified water body=
     
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
     
|River corridor land use=
     
|Average bankfull channel width category=
     
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
     
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Project started=2012/07/01
   
|Project completed=2015/03/01
   
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€
     
|Total1 cost=1,220
|Project started=
|Funding sources=Defra Catchment Restoration Fund
     
|Works started=
     
|Works completed=
     
|Project completed=
     
|Total cost category=
     
|Total1 cost=
     
|Funding sources=
     
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 191: Line 46:
        
        
|Biological quality elements=
|Biological quality elements=
        
       Invertebrates, Macrophytes
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
|Physico-chemical quality elements=
        
       Nutrient concentrations, Specific synthetic pollutants
|Specific mitigation=
|Specific mitigation=
        
       Pollution incident,
|Other motivation=
|Other motivation=
        
        
Line 225: Line 80:
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Case study monitoring documents
|Monitoring document=ANG007 monitoring framework table  v2.docx
|Description=RRC Monitoring table - Upper Welland
}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
|File name=CRF013 Project Brieifng Note - Water Friendly Farming.pdf
|Description=CRF Project briefing note - Upper Welland
}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}

Latest revision as of 16:12, 5 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 38' 16.55" N, 0° 55' 12.77" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/33_waterfriendlyfarming.pdf
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Chris
Main contact surname Stoate
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Pond Conservation, York University, Oxford Brookes University, Sheffield University, Syngenta, Welland Rivers Trust, Anglian Water, Freshwater Habitats Trust, Environment Agency, Defra, Welland Rivers Trust, Welland Rivers Partnership
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Sediment accumulation behind a WFF project ditch dam (Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Water Friendly Farming Project is a multi-partner national demonstration conceived by Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust and Pond Conservation. It seeks to deliver catchment scale benefits to the rural water environment, together with new information about the practical effectiveness of the measures employed in the predominantly agricultural landscape. The project focuses on three 10 km2 upper catchments, and employs a Control, Impact, Before, After (BACI) approach, where two of the three catchments will receive mitigation measures, the third will act as a control.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Welland

Subcatchment

River name Eye Brook
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 226226 m <br />0.226 km <br />22,600 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105031050550



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB105031050550
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Eye Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/07/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/01
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 1,2201,220 k€ <br />1,220,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra Catchment Restoration Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident
Hydromorphology
Biology Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Specific synthetic pollutants
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Reduce diffuse pollution
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Non BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information