Case study:West End Brook - weir removal and track management

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 22' 3.75" N, 1° 4' 31.76" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Charlotte
Main contact surname Hitchmough
Main contact user ID User:ARK
Contact organisation Action for the River Kennet (ARK)
Contact organisation web site http://riverkennet.org
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Foudry Brook Project

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


West End Brook is a tributary of Foudry Brook, which flows in to Reading where it joins the River Kennet. The water body fails to meet WFD good status for fish. The project modified a perched culvert by adding rock and woody material into the stream downstream from the culvert. This both created habitat and refuges for fish and raised the head level through the culvert to remove the drop in water level. The culvert is now passable to fish and the stream offers a less uniform habitat for fish. The project also addressed a difficult track, which was conveying water, sediment and nutrient from an equestrian business into the brook during wet weather. A series of 'sleeping policemen' now divert water from the track into surrounding wet woodland interrupting the flow and allowing sediment to settle out before it reaches the brook.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Failing WFD standards for fish
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Weir removal, Weir modification, Culvert modification
Floodplain / River corridor diversion of flow into surrounding wet woodland
Planform / Channel pattern Introducing large woody debris, Habitat creation, Creation of fish refuge areas
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information