Case study:Twineham Weir Removal & In-channel Enhancements

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 57' 47.61" N, 0° 12' 38.81" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.oart.org.uk/our-work/projects/restoration-projects/twineham-project
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Peter
Main contact surname King
Main contact user ID User:Oartpk
Contact organisation Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.oart.org.uk
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Rampion Offshore Wind Ltd, Sussex Piscatorial Society
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Berm Construction to Create Sinuosity

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Twineham Weir Removal and In-Channel Enhancement project has seen multiple benefits delivered to the upper Adur in West Sussex which has, over many years, been dredged and straightened with numerous impoundments present along its course. In 2014 the Ouse & Adur Rivers Trust (OART) led a project in collaboration with the Environment Agency to remove four weirs on the River Adur and Herrings Stream tributary. Due to the restricted availability of funding a novel approach was taken which saw OART employ the landowner as principle contractor to undertake the work resulting in a cost saving of over £160,000 and enabling work to be undertaken during suitable weather windows without incurring increased costs. The removal of these obstructions has restored river continuity, instigated a more natural dynamic flow regime and removed barriers to fish passage opening up 4.8km of unrestricted river.

Rather than developing a programme of in-channel enhancements prior to removing the weir structures, the partnership decided it would be better to wait to see how the site developed for six months to ensure that any further works were necessary and would be located in appropriate sections of the river. Throughout this period, along with fixed point photography to monitor changes to bank profiles, the local angling clubs were consulted to ensure their requirements were considered within the framework of the enhancement programme. It was clear from an early stage that the main constraint on anglers as a result of this project was reduced water levels limiting access to the river.

To fund the proposed in-channel works the local Environment Agency team negotiated a £15k contribution from Rampion Offshore Wind LTD, a joint venture between EON and the green investment bank, to enhance the upper Adur through the sections impacted by these weir removals on the Herrings Stream and River Adur. A number of previously unknown features had been uncovered through the reduced water levels and a number of the enhancements expected to be necessary could now be removed from the list. The project partnership, in consultation with the Wild Trout Trust, angling clubs and the landowner developed a programme of enhancements which has seen a dozen features created along 2.8km of channel combined with extensive tree planting on the banks and surrounding floodplain to provide natural recharge of woody debris to the channel. Again this work was undertaken by the landowner and his team, building on the relationships developed during the weir removals and allowing limited funding to maximise benefits.

A number of volunteers, including members of the angling club, assisted in the creation of the in-channel features as well as providing essential manpower to plant a trees along the river bank and surrounding floodplain. The overall outcomes of this project are;

  • Four weirs removed from the upper Adur, including the priority structure listed in the South East River Basin Management Plan for this catchment.
  • Five backwaters have been dug to provide shelter for small fish in times of flood and warm conditions in the shallow backwaters will provide an ideal nursery for fish, invertebrates and amphibians.
  • Six berms have been installed along a 1km straight section of river which has narrowed the channel, sped up flows and increased morphological diversity which will in turn improve the ecology.
  • 10 tonnes of gravel placed in two sections of river to improve spawning opportunities for fish, habitat for invertebrates and replacing gravel lost over the centuries due to dredging of the river.
  • 800 trees have been planted to provide shading, bank stabilisation and additional wildlife benefits such as habitat linkage.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Prior to the weir removal fish surveys were conducted by the Environment Agency with the next surveys due in 2016. We continue to liaise with the angling clubs who have kept catch records at this site for a number of years. Currently we are seeing the expected dip in overall biomass of fish through this section as the resident Carp disperse away from the now flowing river and the overall species composition changes. We expect to see more natural, sustainable populations of river species develop over the coming years. The backwater habitats were immediately effective with over 300 fry counted in a single refuge within days of completion and larger individuals recorded during over-winter peak flows resting in the still waters these refuge areas have created.

In addition to the changes in fish species composition we have also recorded two kingfishers on site, the first time they have been observed here for over a decade. Through a separate project OART have been supporting the landowner in a programme of mink trapping which has not only captured 26 mink in its first year (in 2km of river) but has also recorded Polecat (known to have re-colonised Sussex approximately 8 years ago) and seen the number of wading and river birds rapidly increase.

We continue with our regime of fixed point photography to monitor change in bank profiles and the rate of vegetation establishment.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


A number of valuable lessons have been learnt through the process of this project, one of the most important being that previous lessons learnt were implemented into this scheme, cutting down on the time it takes to develop and deliver projects. In addition the following form the additional lessons learnt from this project.

  • It is not always necessary to engineer river restoration project or provide detailed construction designs, especially in the case of demolition of weir structures in areas of no perceived flood risk.
  • Building relationships can lead to cost effective methods of undertaking a variety of river enhancement work, however, all partners must be willing to think a little “outside the box” when discussing delivery options.
  • Angling club concerns remain centered around access to the river when water levels are reduced, the creation of berms which slope into the water not only constrict the channel and create flow diversity but also provide year round access to the water irrespective of the water levels.


Image gallery


Twineham Tilting Gate Pre-Removal
Twineham Tilting Gate Immediate Post Removal
Twineham Tilting Gate 12 months on
Rakes Barn Weir Pre Project (Half Boards Removed)
Twineham Penstock Pre Project
Twineham Penstock Post Project
Wineham Weir with Half the Boards Removed
Upstream Wineham Weir Pre-Project
One of Five Fish Refuges Created
Berm Construction
Volunteers Help With Erosion Control
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district South East
River basin Adur and Ouse

Subcatchment

River name Adur (East)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 4242 m <br />0.042 km <br />4,200 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB107041012180



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Twineham Weir Removal & In-channel Enhancements


Site

Name Twineham
WFD water body codes GB107041012180 & GB107041012150
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Adur (East) & Herrings Stream
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Sea trout (Salmo trutta), kingfisher (Alcedo atthis)
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Clay
River corridor land use Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 8.28.2 m <br />0.0082 km <br />820 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m) 3.83.8 m <br />0.0038 km <br />380 cm <br />
Mean discharge category 1 - 10 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category 0.01 - 0.1
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 48004,800 m <br />4.8 km <br />480,000 cm <br />
Project started 2013/11/04
Works started 2014/08/04
Works completed 2015/09/15
Project completed 2015/09/15
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 180000180,000 k€ <br />180,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Defra WFD funded, Rampion Offshore Wind Ltd, OART

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 10 - 50 k€ Environment Agency Gareth Williams
Stakeholder engagement and communication 20002,000 k€ <br />2,000,000 € <br /> Ouse & Adur Rivers Trust Peter King
Works and works supervision 158000158,000 k€ <br />158,000,000 € <br /> Ouse & Adur Rivers Trust Peter King
Post-project management and maintenance Landowner Robert Worsley
Monitoring 10 - 50 k€ Ouse & Adur Rivers Trust Peter King



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Freshwater flow regime, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Weir removal, Creation of backwaters, Habitat restoration, Creation of berms, Gravel augmentation
Floodplain / River corridor Tree planting
Planform / Channel pattern Adding sinuosity, Enhancing flow diversity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Volunteer engagement
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information