Case study:The Red River: Abandoned Metal Mines

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 13' 49.07" N, 5° 18' 18.66" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Hugh
Main contact surname Potter
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations The Coal Authority (UK)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Dolcoath Mine circa. 1890

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Red River catchment is made up of three waterbodies - the Upper and Lower Red River and the Roseworthy Stream. The river drains a relatively small but intensively mined area of south-west Cornwall. Unlike many of the rivers impacted by metal mines in Cornwall, the Red River is affected not only by the legacy of historic mining throughout the catchment, but also, in the lower catchment, by more recent workings from South Crofty Tin Mine. Whereas most metal mines in Cornwall had ceased working by the early 1900's, 'Crofty' didn't close until 1998 and the site owner, Western United Mines' went into administration in June 2013. However, in July 2016 the Canadian firm Strongbow Exploration Inc acquired the rights to South Crofty, carrying out water treatment tests over winter as the mine will need de-watering.

Historic water quality data shows that Red River waters were severely affected by local mining activities between 1980 and 1998. In particular, waters arising from the South Crofty site during this period contained very high levels of particulate metal pollutants such as iron, zinc, copper and cadmium. The closure of South Crofty mine in 1998 resulted in a significant decrease in total metal concentrations downstream from the working site, although elevated levels of metals continue to arise from waters draining through historic mine workings such as the Treskillard Stream and Dolcoath deep adit discharge. In contrast to these improvements in river water quality, the closure and flooding of South Crofty mine (1998-2000) resulted in significant deterioration in the quality of Red River waters flowing downstream past Roscroggan portal (the Dolcoath adit discharge). Water quality data for the discharge, via Roscroggan portal, show that very high peaks in metal contaminant concentrations (along with additional flows) coincided with the decant of South Crofty mine waters in early November 2000.

More recent work has shown that the upper catchment is dominated by elevated copper from the Treskillard stream which drains abandoned mines from the south east of Camborne, and that under wet weather conditions there are additional inputs from tips and spoil heaps. In terms of impacts, in the Treskillard stream concentrations of Zn, Cu and Cd have been found to be 163ug/L, 363ug/L and 0.42ug/L respectively, with annual load of Zn of 230kg and Cu of 442kg. For the Dolcoath Adit the concentrations of Zn, Cu and Cd are 766ug/L, 23ug/L and 1.42ug/L respectively. The annual load of Zn is 3,400kg, and 106kg Cu.

Waterbody ecological status is Moderate
Length of watercourse affected is 12km
Water quality at WFD point (Gwithian) (ug/l): Zn = 196 (EQS = 75); Cu = 11.8 (EQS = 10); Cd = 0.28 (EQS = 0.15)
Likely bioavailable EQS at Gwithian (ug/l): Zn = 16; Cu = 7

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district South West
River basin West Cornwall and the Fal

Subcatchment

River name Red River (Upper)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 241241 m <br />0.241 km <br />24,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB108049000600



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB108049000600
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Red River (Upper)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 12km12,000 m <br />1,200,000 cm <br />
Project started 2016/07/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident, Mine drainage metal concentrations
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Improving water quality


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information