Case study:Stage 0 channel restoration

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 28' 33.74" N, 2° 5' 43.55" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Thomas
Main contact surname Hartland Smith
Main contact user ID User:Tom UK
Contact organisation Severn Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://https://www.severnriverstrust.com/
Partner organisations Dudley Council, Wolverhampton City Council
Parent multi-site project

Black Country Blue Networks

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project, set in the heart of Saltwells NNR, was one of several across the Black Country that collectively advanced the Severn Rivers Trust's efforts in the Worcestershire Middle Severn catchment area. With funding from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Black Country Blue Networks 2 project enabled this work between 2021 and 2023.

After multiple on-site discussions, we ultimately decided to pursue a stage 0 channel restoration. This approach, which involved resetting the river to allow it to develop a more natural single or multi-channel structure, was particularly exciting. However, due to the site’s highly urbanized setting, concerns arose about flood risk, access challenges, historical pollution, infrastructure impacts, and public perception.

Initial Meetings: At the project’s outset, staff from the Severn Rivers Trust engaged with Dudley Council rangers to identify potential site-specific features that could benefit the blue network. The senior ranger vaguely remembered a weir within the NNR. Since access was challenging, clearing a path was necessary to reach the site and assess the structure's passability. Upon visiting the site and conducting the assessment, we confirmed that the weir remained intact and posed a complete barrier to fish passage. As a result, we began developing a project to either remove or bypass this barrier.

Getting Started: Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (MBC) supported the idea of removing or bypassing the weir. Given that Black Brook is classified as an ordinary watercourse, we held pre-application meetings with the Lead Local Flood Authority. It’s common for Severn Rivers Trust staff to conduct desk studies during this stage to support the application. This involves reviewing services, historical maps, species data, and other relevant information to shape project plans. During this analysis, we uncovered previously unknown site features, including a second, larger weir upstream and a greater extent of channel straightening and dredging than initially identified. These findings, made possible through LiDAR analysis, highlighted the value of thorough preliminary research.

Project Development: Considering the entire site, it became clear that restoring the channel to its natural state would require significant funding and cause substantial environmental disturbance to the reach. Machine access would be difficult, necessitating bog matting and wide-track equipment along the length of the site. This led us to explore a stage 0 approach, which involved installing a single channel block to divert water from the artificial channel. This would allow the water to naturally reshape its path across the landscape on the true left-hand bank. As the water carved its way, new channels would form in the landscape, creating a dynamic, braided wetland that could move laterally and stay fully connected to the surrounding floodplain.

Design and Consenting: Given the project’s location, diverting water out of the established channel raised concerns about potential risks to the wider landscape and local community. Therefore, detailed modeling was required to obtain ordinary watercourse consent. Dynamic Rivers conducted the modeling, allowing us to evaluate the potential impacts of three different blockage designs. By incorporating topography and flow data, we could conclude that the project would not have negative effects and would likely enhance the catchment's resilience to high-flow events.

To mitigate risks of erosion and damage to downstream infrastructure during high flows, trees were felled across the bund and downstream to prevent bank erosion as the brook returned to its previous channel.

Project Delivery: The contractor, Sandfields, was selected through a competitive tendering process, ensuring a range of skills for the work. During site visits with the contractor, we agreed on a high bankside approach to minimize impacts on riparian vegetation and reduce the risk of equipment becoming bogged down. Arrangements for site access were coordinated with the council well in advance, and public notices were posted weeks before the project began. Mobilization and the on-site work were completed over two days.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Unfortunately this project was a capital project which did not allow for monitoring, however monitoring of the instillation of the bund and the large woody material to make sure if they have moved or are eroding.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


first site visit
bund options for Dynamic Rivers
Project Impact map
before works
post works
machines onsite
large woody material in the channel
wet woodland
created new wet woodland
securing material for flood risk mitigation
bund with willow planting in surface
maneuvering chopped material into the channel for bank protection
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Severn
River basin Worcestershire Middle Severn

Subcatchment

River name R Stour (Worcs) - conf Smestow Bk to conf R Severn
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 219219 m <br />0.219 km <br />21,900 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB109054044710



Site

Name Saltwells NNR
WFD water body codes GB109054044750
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Stour (Worcs) source to conf Smestow Bk Water Body
Pre-project morphology Over deepened, Straightened, Single channel, Reinforced banks
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Anastomosing, Braided
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation UK - National Nature Reserves
Local/regional site designations SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest)
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest European eel (Anguilla anguilla)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Clay, Gravel
River corridor land use Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Wetland, Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 400400 m <br />0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Project started 2021-09-01
Works started 2023-02-06
Works completed 2023-02-07
Project completed 2023-02-20
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources ERDF (45%), Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Barrier removal, Channel realignment, Connection to wider floodplain
Planform / Channel pattern Cleaning of spawning gravels
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information