Case study:South Milton Sands

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 15' 23.03" N, 3° 51' 24.23" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/60_southmiltonsands.pdf
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Richard
Main contact surname Snow
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation National Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/
Partner organisations South Hams District Council, Plymouth Council, Plymouth Coastal Observatory
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Between 2003 and 2009, the National Trust restored South Milton Sands in Devon (Photo 1 and Map 1), a heavily used 4ha sand dune site with a small beach, a café and extensive car parking. The wooden piling defences constructed in 1990 were at the end of their lifespan and thought unsustainable given the erosion at the site. The designed scheme removed the failing defences and reprofiled the dunes, which allowed the dunes to erode and build according to natural processes. Once groundwork was completed, local people helped plant the marram grass on the dunes. Following consultation, the National Trust agreed to maintain a small area of defence to an existing slipway for a 10-year period. The project was viewed as a success. A storm on 14 February 2014 eroded about 15m of the sand dunes and lowered beach levels by some 2m. The southern end of the access track and the slipway were undermined. Boardwalks to access the beach were broken. The dune ridge was overtopped but did not breach. However the loss of two-thirds of the dune ridge (including the area reinstated and revegetated in 2009) made the frontage highly vulnerable to breach in a future storm. The National Trust has reinstated the access road and slipway, but the dunes cannot be sustained in their current location. The 20-year erosion line in the Shoreline Management Plan passes through the car park and close to the café. Sea level rise and increased storminess will make the existing defence line unsustainable. National Trust wants a way forward that is sustainable and works with natural processes in accordance with its Shifting Shores policy. The current car park and access road are unsustainable in the long term and alternatives will be investigated. These need to be the subject of public engagement and the National Trust intends to consider the options. The dunes might be sustainable in a more landward location. The future of the wetland and associated outfall also needs to be considered. If the outfall is removed, water levels will likely increase and water will find its own route to the beach, either by percolation or a (seasonal) surface channel through (rolled back) dunes. This approach could create a mosaic of dune and wetland habitat.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2003
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) £10k"£" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources National Trust

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood and coastal erosion protection
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Sand dune restoration
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information