Case study:Source to Sea Programme – 8. River Keer Restoration

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 8' 44.51" N, 2° 42' 49.01" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Sarah
Main contact surname Littlefield
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Lune Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.riverconservation.org.uk/
Partner organisations Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Cumbria Woodlands, Lune Rivers Trust, Morecambe Bay Partnership, Arnside & Silverdale AONB Partnership, South Cumbria Rivers Trust, RSPB
Parent multi-site project

Case study:Source to Sea Programme

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
River Keer - Stretch of river prior to new fencing being installed

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Although the Keer is currently in good ecological condition diffuse agricultural pollution remains a major issue, and migratory fish populations have shown very sharp declines.

This project is aimed at improving habitat and ensuring that there is no deterioration in condition, by minimising erosion, sedimentation and diffuse pollution. Working with farmers and landowners at least 1,000 metres of riparian buffer strips up to 10 metre wide on demonstration sites will be establish using HLS or EWGS as appropriate.

Community Involvement - Engagement activities will include public consultations, practical volunteering activities like beach cleans, and tree planting, and awareness-raising through media and face-to-face contact.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district North West
River basin Lune

Subcatchment

River name River Keer
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Grassland
Waterbody ID GB112073064430



Site

Name River Keer
WFD water body codes GB112073064430, GB112073071240, GB112073071250
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name River Keer
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/06/26
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/03/31
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 13501,350 k€ <br />1,350,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Diffuse pollution
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Fenced off riverbank
Floodplain / River corridor Fencing of riparian zone
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Awareness raising, Media
Other Practical volunteering activities like beach cleans, Public consultation


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents





Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information