Case study:Soaring connections: restoring people, wildlife & place

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 39' 26.74" N, 1° 7' 37.37" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Alex
Main contact surname McDonald
Main contact user ID User:Amcdonald04
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Leicester City Council
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Ellis Meadows wetland

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Soaring connections is the umbrella title for the Leicester FRMS and various community projects in the city focusing on the water environment. Together they form an innovative project, reducing flood risk to over 2000 properties whilst improving Green Infrastructure (GI) and reconnecting communities with their local watercourse.

The EA and LCC are working together on a 6 year programme of work to reduce the risk of flooding in the city, with a particular emphasis on bringing wider benefits through environmental enhancements, public space improvements and regeneration.

The Leicester FRM scheme has transformed under-used public open spaces in the city by improving public access, recreation opportunities and creating new habitat along the River Soar corridor. The scheme works by removing barriers to the movement of flood water and improving the capacity of the floodplain to store water.

In 2008 the use of traditional flood protection methods was investigated but found to be unviable. The decision was made to take a more innovative approach, one that would provide multiple benefits for people and wildlife as well as being a catalyst for regeneration within the city. Using the hydraulic model of the catchment constrictions in flow were identified that were causing increased flood levels in Leicester. Combining this with Leicester’s Green Infrastructure Strategy areas of underused public open space including areas of closely mown amenity grassland and sports pitches of low ecological value along the River Soar corridor were targeted.

Entering construction in 2014, Phase 1 and 2 of the scheme are now complete and focused on reconnecting the river with its floodplain through the Aylestone and Birstall areas of Leicester. This has been achieved through removing constrictions, land lowering and wetland creation. As well as reducing flood risk, the scheme has delivered significant environmental enhancements with the creation of new wetland areas, wildflower meadows, tree planting, habitat improvement, cycle path improvements and new public seating areas.

Community projects including Shared Waters and Waterside Care work across the city to deliver educational sessions and practical habitat work focused on the water environment. This ranges from retrofitting SuDs in schools to hold back and clean water to water themed yarn-bombing and a water themed play developed by Leicester college pupils. All aim to re engage the diverse population of Leicester with their watercourse, telling its story in their own words.

Works included:
- Creation of backwater to allow storage of water and act as fish refuge
- Habitat improvements including wildflower meadow creation and tree planting to improve habitat diversity within river corridor
- Change in topography through earth movement to lower areas adjacent to river and raise those further away e.g. moving sports pitches onto newly raised ground away from the river
- Change in management of public open space and newly created wetland areas to maintain greater habitat diversity
- Control of Himalayan balsam and Japanese knotweed
- Community projects including SuDs in schools & community clean ups
- Public & stakeholder engagement on design
- Community habitat management sessions on improved areas of public open space
- Sediment fingerprinting study to identify inputs into the River Soar catchment

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


For all sites where construction work has taken place an extended phase 1 habitat survey and subsequent protected species surveys including badger, otter, bat and water vole have taken place. A large amount of badger work had to be done including closing a number of setts under license. On-going monitoring took place during and after the construction works. A mitigation sett was created and is well used with new foraging routes and evidence of bedding being changed.

All of the new planting works are subject to a 5 year monitoring and maintenance program to ensure establishment. The areas are vegetating up well and will be regularly checked by a landscape architect to ensure they continue in this way.

The EA has a regular WFD monitoring looking at the biological and physio-chemical elements of the watercourses in the area.

Beetles and incidental invertebrates are being recorded by a volunteer VC55 Recorder at Ellis meadows to record pioneer species. Botanical surveys for the phase 1 works are being undertaken by the city ecologist and the Leicestershire & Rutland Ornithological society undertake monthly bird recording

Waterside Care groups report on group activity and habitat work. To date the river Soar groups have undertaken 348 volunteer hours and removed 98 bags of rubbish from the Soar and undertaken & water quality testing activities. This water quality data is submitted to the EA and in time we will be able to monitor any change. In addition six community groups around the city monitor water quality and submit results to FreshWater Watch

The University of Southampton have undertaken a sediment fingerprinting study on the Willow brook catchment and this will feed into future work on NFM and sediment management.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


This is the start of a 6-year programme of flood risk management works within Leicester. The Soar is navigable in Leicester and as most work was undertaken to improve conveyance we were limited in what improvements to marginal habitat could be undertaken. Most work involved wetland creation within the river corridor and creation of backwaters. Going forward future flood schemes on the Soar tributaries should look at the in-channel and marginal habitat improvements which should help to have a greater impact on WFD classifications.

Leicester is home to surprising amount of protected species for an urban environment. A lot of monitoring work was undertaken and careful consideration given to this during construction. This is something that will feed into future work to ensure that new foraging habitat created is not affected by subsequent work.

Leicester has a very diverse community which speak a large number of languages and for many English isn't their first language. A lot of the information we are trying to convey is in English which means that especially in tackling issues around diffuse pollution the message may be lost. We are looking at ways we can be more effective in getting the message out by doing work with schools and community groups who can then pass the message on.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Soar

Subcatchment

River name Soar from Sence to Rothley Brook
Area category
Area (km2) 59.11359.113 km² <br />5,911.3 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID GB104028047030



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Soaring connections: restoring people, wildlife & place


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB104028047030
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Soar from Sence to Rothley Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations local wildlife site
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest European Otter, bats (various), badger
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Silt
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 2500m2.5 km <br />250,000 cm <br />
Project started 2013/03/01
Works started 2014/11/03
Works completed 2016/09/01
Project completed 2017/12/31
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Risk Management, Environment Agency Grant in Aid, Leicester City Council, Leicester & Leicestershire Local Economic Partnership

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology River is navigable
Biology pressure on macrophytes and phytobentos from point source discharge
Physico-chemical Issues with phosphate due to diffuse urban pollution and point source discharge
Other reasons for the project Regeneration of public open space


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of backwaters, Creation of fish refuge areas, Embankment lowering
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetland, Floodplain reconnection, Habitat enhancement, Tree planting
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Recovering natural landscapes
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Removal of invasive species, Land management
Social measures (incl. engagement) Engagement with schools, Engagement with a wide range of stakeholders, Community consultation, Community involvement
Other Sediment fingerprinting study to identify inputs into the River Soar catchment


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Invertebrates Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Macrophytes Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Oxygen balance Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
PH Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Specific non-synthetic pollutants Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Amphibians Yes No No Yes No
Bat Survey Yes No No Yes No
Birds, butterflies and dragonflies Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
European otter Yes No No Yes No
Flood risk management Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement
Habitat mapping Yes No No Yes No Improvement
Public awareness of river Yes Yes Yes No No Improvement


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information