Case study:Sandwich Tidal Defence Scheme
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/55_sandwich.pdf |
Themes | Estuary, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Marine |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Sandwich Town |
Main contact surname | Defences Scheme |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Sandwich Town Defences Scheme |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sandwich-town-tidal-defences/sandwich-town-tidal-defences |
Partner organisations | Environment Agency, Kent County Council, Pfizer |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Sandwich is a historic town and civil parish on the right bank of the River Stour in Kent (Map 1). A major inundation in the Sandwich and Deal area occurred in January 1953 when a North Sea surge – 4.7m Ordnance Datum (OD) at Pegwell Bay – caused the banks of the River Stour to overtop and breach, resulting in extensive flooding. A surge event occurred in 1976, estimated 1 in 25 (4% annual exceedance probability, AEP) and again in 1983, estimated 1 in 10 to 1 in 5 (10% to 20% AEP), causing flooding at Sandwich Quay with 16 properties suffering direct flooding. A scheme was constructed in 2015 to reduce the risk of flooding to the local community and businesses.
The scheme provided a 1 in 200 standard of protection to both banks with 50 years of sea level rise included in the design. This protects 486 homes and 94 commercial properties in Sandwich (Photo 1). It cost £21.7 million, with £11.5 million provided in partnership funding from Kent Country Council and Pfizer.
The scheme consisted of 14.4km of strengthening and improving the existing tidal river defences, and creation of a 240ha tidal flood relief area between Sandwich and the mouth of the River Stour. Part of this enabled the creation of 20ha of new Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) habitat, which includes a mosaic of wetland habitats.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|