Case study:River Trent, Bucknall Park

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 1' 32.35" N, 2° 9' 7.59" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Mel
Main contact surname Westlake
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Staffordshire Trent Valley
Contact organisation web site http://www.staffs-wildlife.org.uk/staffstrentvalley
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Friends of Bucknall Park, Staffordshire Trent Valley, Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, AECOM, Mark Stubbs Contracting Ltd
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Trent rises at Kynpersley and flows through the heart of Stoke-on-Trent. It has had a chequered history and has been subjected to man-made interventions and high levels of pollution. As a consequence of this Environment Agency monitoring data shows this section of the River Trent is failing UK environmental standards for phosphate levels and the low presence of invertebrates and fish. Additionally, man-made structures within the watercourse act as barriers to habitat connectivity and prevent free passage for fish migration.

The River Trent flows through Bucknall Park, a popular recreational green space in Stoke-on-Trent. There is a partially collapsed weir within the watercourse at this site which is the last remaining barrier in the headwaters of the Trent. Removal of this weir would remove this barrier and also address health and safety concerns held by Stoke-on-Trent City Council and the Friends of Bucknall Park, a community group affiliated with the site.

In 2017 funding was provided by the Environment Agency under its Water Environment Improvement Fund to allow for the removal of this weir. The design of the scheme was carried out by Staffordshire Wildlife Trust on behalf of the Staffordshire Trent Valley Catchment Partnership. A number of partners have been involved through the design and delivery of this project and are credited below.

Summary of the Scheme Delivery Objectives

• Removal of the partially collapsed weir to restore the natural dynamic processes of the river and remove the physical barrier to aid fish passage.
• Improve in channel habit by introducing woody debris which will act as a sediment trap and hold fine gravel both of which are important requirements, for example, for brown trout and brook lamprey.
• Provide access to the river for local residents and visitors to be able to enjoy and reconnect to their waterways. To also allow access for local schools and other non-uniform groups to provide an educational resource.
• Provide access to the watercourse for the Friends of Bucknall Park to be able to undertake RiverLife monitoring on site as part of ongoing monitoring of invertebrates.

Consents / Constraints / Other Issues

Flood risk consent was required from the Environment Agency to undertake the in channel work.

There was a very small window of time in which to complete the work as we had to avoid bird nesting season, trout spawning season plus spend the money within the required financial period of the Environment Agency. This timing meant that there was a likelihood of high water levels which may have prevented the project delivery.

Non native species. The river has been colonized by a large population of American signal crayfish. The banks also have some stands of Himalayan balsam and Japanese knotweed. The method statement and risk assessment for the scheme delivery ensured strict disinfection routines and Check, Clean, Dry to avoid the risk of accidentally spreading these species (and/or crayfish plague) to other sites.

Summary of other project benefits – social, economic, etc. • Removal of a physical barrier has improved the habitat along a 10km stretch of the Trent
• Improved access to the river for schools and non-uniform groups for educational purposes
• Re-connecting local people to the river within a popular greenspace
• Access to be able to undertake invertebrate monitoring with the Friends of Bucknall Park
• New WFD demonstration site in Staffordshire Trent Valley Catchment area

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The Friends of Bucknall Park, supported by the catchment partnership will carry out RiverLife monitoring 4 times per year. The Environment Agency have carried out Electrofishing surveys on site. Local sighting or issues are reported via the catchment coordinator.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


008 Image Bucknall - breaking out weir MR.jpg
009 Image Bucknall - removal of trash MR.jpg
011 Image Bucknall Park 10 months after weir removal on r.trent Jan '18 MR.jpg
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Humber RBD / Trent Source to Sow Operational Catchment/ River Trent
WFD water body codes GB104028053271
WFD (national) typology Moderate for Invertebrates and Fish, Poor for Phosphate
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish: Abundance, Invertebrates: Abundance
Physico-chemical Phosphate
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Weir removal
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Partnerships
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information