Case study:River Keekle Restoration

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 32' 46.63" N, 3° 32' 29.36" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://westcumbriariverstrust.org/projects/keekle
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Luke
Main contact surname Bryant
Main contact user ID User:WCRT
Contact organisation West Cumbria Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://westcumbriariverstrust.org/
Partner organisations Environment Agency, Natural England, AECOM, university of salford
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Keekle is a tributary of the River Ehen located around 3 kilometres east of Whitehaven, in West Cumbria. The river was heavily modified until the 1990s due to nearby coal mining. After mine spoil was buried across the site the river was lined with an HDPE plastic liner. This liner was failing and heavily degraded, posing a flood risk and potential catastrophic contamination issue for the Keekle, as well as the River Ehen which is a Site of Special Scientific Interest and a Special Area of Conservation. Research by the University of Salford showed the liner had been shedding 500kg of plastic particles per year since its installation.


There was also concern that the river would vertically erode through the clay cap installed below the liner and expose ground water potentially mixed with mine waste that was buried in the 1990s, allowing heavy metals and chemicals to leach into the Keekle and further downstream. Whilst all of the EA’s sampling of water quality currently proved there was no contamination across the site, if nothing was done to stop erosion, there was a real possibility of the Keekle exposing mine waste in the future.


The Upper Keekle was also failing under the Water Framework Directive classification as a habitat for fish due to mining-related modifications. The modifications include the liner, bed-check weirs that washed out during floods in the 1990s, erratic boulder locations and areas where the plastic has broken up, creating barriers to natural fish migration.


This project, over a two-year period (2019-2020) removed the entire extent of plastic lining, replacing with boulders, cobbles and gravels to naturalise the river. A total of 180 tonnes of plastic was eventually removed and recycled, whilst around 16,000 tonnes of stones were imported into the site and strategically placed throughout the 2.5km expanse of restored river.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Typical condition pre-restoration
Pre Restoration 2.jpg
Pre Restoration 4.jpg
Pre Restoration 5.jpg
Aerial view post-restoration
Aerial view post-restoration
Natural features in river, post-restoration
Aerial view post-restoration
River now has space to renaturalise
Cobbles, gravels and boulders have now replaced the plastic liner
Aerial view post-restoration
Cobbles, gravels and boulders have now replaced the plastic liner
Newly-created wetlands join the main river
Aerial view showing variety of in-river features and habitats
Priests Gill, a particularly steep tributary, posed several difficulties during restoration
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district North West
River basin South West Lakes

Subcatchment

River name River Keekle (upper)
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 245245 m <br />0.245 km <br />24,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB112074070030



Site

Name Keekle
WFD water body codes GB112074070030
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Keekle (upper)
Pre-project morphology Artificial bed
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Pool-riffle, Step-pool, Actively meandering
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Salmon (Salmo salar) and Sea-trout (Salmo trutta trutta), brown trout (Salmo trutta), European eel, Brook lamprey, Sea lamprey, stone loach
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Clay, Earth, Cobble, Boulders, Gravel
River corridor land use Rough unimproved grassland/pasture, Plantation forestry
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category 0.001 - 0.01
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 25202,520 m <br />2.52 km <br />252,000 cm <br />
Project started 04/12/2017
Works started 2019/05/13
Works completed 2020/09/22
Project completed 2021/09/03
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 15150001,515,000 k€ <br />1,515,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Water Environment Fund, Environment Agency

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Bank erosion, Recreation, Community demand


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information