Case study:River Glyme Stratford Restoration

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 51' 44.43" N, 1° 21' 9.21" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Hilary
Main contact surname Phillips
Main contact user ID User:Hilary Phillips
Contact organisation Wild Oxfordshire / Evenlode Catchment Partnership
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.wildoxfordshire.org.uk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Evenlode Catchment Integrated Water Management

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Re-meandering the Glyme by James Aylward

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


1. The project was to restore a stretch of the River Glyme with the following objectives: • Enhancing the channel and floodplain habitat diversity • Re-grading banks and re-planting with native species where needed • Form pool-riffle sequences, raise the river-bed and provide a good medium for spawning fish • Manipulate spatial structure of the channel form & hydraulics across the flow range • Increase diversity of floodplains habitat • Improve habitat downstream at Woodstock Water Meadows (WWM) • Increase community engagement 2. The restoration took place on the reach between Stratford Bridge (444,645 218,482) and Woodstock Water Meadows (444,933 218,004), a 5 Ha site between Old and New Woodstock owned by Woodstock Town Council. 3. The river restoration was completed in late 2015, with WWM habitat and community engagement on-going until November 2016. 4. Prior to around 1890 the River Glyme at this location had a sinuous course. It was then extensively straightened and its bed lowered. More recently, the main channel has been heavily maintained by dredging, leaving it over-wide, significantly incised and very uniform in both cross section and plan-form. The majority of the hard bed has been removed, with little gravel remaining in a clay and silt dominated substrate. The river is now largely disconnected from its immediate floodplain except in times of high flow. This section of river should support a thriving wild brown trout population as well as other species; the lack of suitable spawning substrate had led to limited recruitment in this species. Increased sediment input and diffuse pollution from upstream (agricultural run-off) and the lack of connectivity with the flood plain have contributed to substantial siltation and associated water quality issues in the Blenheim Lake SSSI and World Heritage site downstream. Physical manipulation of channel planform, bed levels and flow patterns was undertaken to enhance the channel habitat diversity. This was achieved through the introduction of locally quarried stone, overlain with gravel to provide optimum conservation benefit for a range of species and spawning/juvenile brown trout. The introduction of Large Woody Debris (LWD) will help to maintain these new areas of gravel. Meanders were excavated, banks re-graded and arisings redistributed behind brushwood faggot revetments. In combination with the excavation of scrapes this serves to increase the diversity of floodplain habitats. An ongoing programme of habitat maintenance and community engagement is being led at WWM in collaboration with the ECP, Woodstock town council, Blenheim Estates and other local community groups and is due to finish in November 2016.

Management included a video to raise awareness and engagement.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


As with the project as a whole the monitoring and evaluation is a collaboration between partners. Project objectives were used to set the method and frequency for data collection with monitoring results collated and evaluated by the ECP. Methods used include: • Fixed point and drone photography, habitat mapping, vegetative surveys, riverfly monitoring and electro-fishing to monitor increases in habitat diversity and change in macro-invertebrate and fish assemblages. • Electro-fishing, catch returns, red counts to monitor increase in Brown trout spawning on gravels. • Fixed point photography and cross-sections plus flow measurements to monitor channel and morphological changes. Photographs will be georeferenced and stored. Evaluated after every set of photos (in-house) and included in final evaluation report alongside all other data. An initial evaluation report will be produced at the end of 2016, with 3 year monitoring reports contributing to a final project evaluation on 2019. Despite the relatively small scale of this project on the Glyme at Stratford (>1000mtrs restored) the upstream EA gauging weir has been used to demonstrate how the water level throughout the whole system has been raised by the restoration of the river. The increase shown is in the region of 0.2m. This means that the river spills out onto its floodplain earlier, slowing the flow of water and providing natural flood management downstream. This will also help by settling sediment out earlier during the hydrographic peak, benefitting downstream habitats and communities. The catchment-scale effects of the scheme are apparent in the water level record some 5km downstream, at the River Evenlode gauging station at Cassington. Changes in storage in the river channel are transmitted downstream as water level variations at the gauging station. This signal is recorded at low flows. Further post-restoration channel measurements and monitoring will be taken and evaluated to better quantify this initial interpretation of data.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Too soon to say - this section will be updated when monitoring reults have been evaluated.


Image gallery


Stone to raise levels by Vaughan Lewis
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin Cotswolds

Subcatchment

River name Glyme (Dorn confluence to Evenlode)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 147147 m <br />0.147 km <br />14,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB106039029940



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039029940
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Glyme (Dorn confluence to Evenlode)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 10001,000 m <br />1 km <br />100,000 cm <br />
Project started 2015/06/01
Works started 2015/08/26
Works completed 2015/09/23
Project completed 2016/11/30
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Connection to groundwaters, Width & depth variation, Flow velocities, Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones, Substrate conditions
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Age structure, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Enhancing linkages between landowners and communities along the river reach


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Introducing large woody debris, Riffle creation, Introduction of spawning gravels, Restoring gravel bed, Creation of revetments, Bed raising, Bank stabilisation, Diversification of in-channel features, Bank reprofiling
Floodplain / River corridor Connection to wider floodplain, Excavation for floodplain creation, Wetland habitat
Planform / Channel pattern Meandering channel
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Associated terrestrial habitat improvements at historic water meadows downstream
Social measures (incl. engagement) Community involvement, University links established, Media, Community Education
Other Monitoring and survey projects, sediment taken out of system before reaching historic lakes downstream


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information