Case study:Restoration of Wandle Park

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 22' 28.09" N, 0° 6' 43.42" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Tom
Main contact surname Sweeney
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Croydon Council
Contact organisation web site http://www.croydon.gov.uk/
Partner organisations Royal HaskoningDHV
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Site Location Plan

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Wandle is located in the southeast of England. It is approximately 14km long with two sources, one at Waddon Ponds (Croydon) and the other at Carshalton Ponds (Sutton). It flowsnorth-eastthrough Croydon, Sutton, Lambeth, Merton and Wandsworth to then join the Tidal Thames. The River Wandle runs under the Wandle Park, in the London Borough of Croydon, for approximately 350mand is only evident by the presence of two man-hole access chambers located within the park’s playing fields. The parkis located at OSgrid reference TQ31681,65563 and covers anarea of 8.5 hectares. Wandle Park is owned and managed by Croydon Council. It is surrounded byamultitude of land-use types including residential, industrial and commercial. The London Borough of Croydon in partnership with the Environment Agency is developing a scheme to restore the River Wandle at Wandle Park, Croydon. The London Borough of Croydon believes that the park is presently an underused asset and wishes to restore the park to reflect is original Victorian lay out. The main objectives of the project are as follows: Restore the river corridor through Wandle Park improving the habitat for local wildlife; Provide flood risk benefit for properties downstream to approximately 1 in 50 return period; Providethe local community with an opportunity to enjoy a high-quality environment and encourage people to care for, use, appreciate and enjoy the environment; Improve the water quality in the channel in support of the Water Framework Directive, helping to meet Good Ecological Potential (GEP) in the catchmentand; Provideflood storagethat will contribute to the London Rivers Action Plan.

Update (July 2015) The London Borough of Croydon worked in partnership with Royal HaskoningDHV and LDA Design to oversee the design and implementation of an ambitious scheme to regenerate Wandle Park, improving an important green space into an asset for the local community and contributing towards the delivery of WFD objectives. At the heart of this ambitious £2 million scheme was the restoration of over 250m of the River Wandle, previously culverted below ground, into an open, naturally functioning meandering channel. This project was Highly Commended at the 2015 Landscape Institute Awards.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


This project had a range of key challenges that were overcome through the design process, including: • The restoration of natural hydromorphological processes whilst minimising the potential for large scale channel migration. This was resolved through the design of a multi-stage channel which allows the low flow channel to adjust within a more permanent high flow bank line. Seeded gravels were also allowed to rework naturally to create a wide range of in-channel habitat niches. The two stage channel safely accommodates both the low dry weather flows and the high flood flows. • Ensuring that the river could be re-meandered through contaminated land at the site without increasing remobilisation of in situ contaminated sediments and leachate. An uncontaminated capping layer using uncontaminated soils was used to protect the environment and park users from contaminated materials. • Minimising the need for expensive off-site disposal of contaminated materials and the need to import uncontaminated soils for capping. Soils on the site were categorized as contaminated and less contaminated (i.e. with contaminant concentrations below hazardous levels), and the former were used as a base layer for landscape features within the park. These were capped with less contaminated soils from the site to prevent exposure to the wider environment.


Image gallery


During works
Post restoration, April 2014 © Royal HaskoningDHV
Post restoration, June 2013 © Royal HaskoningDHV
Post restoration panoramic, June 2013 © Royal HaskoningDHV
New river crossing, June 2013 June 2013 © Royal HaskoningDHV
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin London

Subcatchment

River name Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 282282 m <br />0.282 km <br />28,200 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Suburban
Waterbody ID GB106039023460



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beddington Park, Beddington Park Enhancements, Boulder Pool and Plough Lane, Durand Close, EDF Weir removal, Eel Pass over tilting weir at Ravensbury Park, Garratt Park, Hackbridge Restoration, Hackbridge weir notch, King Georges Park... further results


Site

Name Wandle Park
WFD water body codes GB106039023460
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Wandle (Croydon to Wandsworth) and the R. Gravney
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation"Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation" is not in the list (All - multiple designations across the site, International - Biosphere Reserves, International - Geoparks, International - RAMSAR site, International - World Heritage Site, EU - Biogenetic Reserves Network, EU - European Diploma Site, EU - Special Area of Conservation, EU - Special Protected Area, EU - WFD protected area (drinking water, shellfish etc.), ...) of allowed values for the "Site designation" property.
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2009/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2013/12/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/files/Conference/2015/Outputs/presentations/6.1.3 ian dennis.pdf Restoring Wandle Park - RRC Conference 2015 Presentation

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information