Case study:Reopening of Mjølløst stream
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Planned |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Miguel A. |
Main contact surname | Segarra Valls |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Vannområde Horten-Larvik |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/vestfold-og-telemark/vannomrader/horten---larvik/ |
Partner organisations | Sandefjord kommune, Sandefjord Forvaltningsråd for Anadrom Laksefisk |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Mjølløst stream is part of a 17 km long stream system.
Mjølløst stream has since the 1960s had a 270 meter long stream closure that prevents sea trout from accessing a 1.4 km stream stretch. The concrete pipe is getting closer to the end of its lifetime and might collapse in the next years if nothing is done. Landowner, local and regional authorities are positive to remove the culvert and restore the original stream. This project got funding from Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) in 2020 and we intend to implement it in 2021, if it is technically possible (see "Lessons learnt").
Monitoring surveys and results
Results electrofishing October 2020 (before reopening of the stream):
Station 1 (downstreams closure): 141 trout / 100 m2. Station 2 (upstreams closure): 1 trout / 100m2. Station 3 (200 m ustreams closuse): 57 trout / 100m2.
Fish from upstream stations (2 and 3) is stationary trout introduced by local people from other locations.
Lessons learnt
1. Because of its proximity to the railway (< 30 m) it is required an approval from the railway authorities (Bane-Nor) in order to be able to daylight / deculvert the stream.
2. There can be quick clay (kvikkleire) in the area of restoration according to NVE (Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate). This makes necessary to explore the ground stability before digging the pipe out of the ground. This will increase considerably the costs of the project.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationPreliminary estimates.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|