Case study:Kimpton Park
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Joanna |
Main contact surname | Heisse |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | London Borough of Sutton |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Divert existing Pyl Brook channel near culvert entrance through Hamilton Avenue recreation ground and reconnect it into the existing watercourse 113m downstream. The total length of the diversion channel is 164m which effectively increases the watercourse length by 51m. The new channel will incorporate a sinuous channel with riffles, pools and berms. The old channel will be partially infilled and will form an undisturbed island of habitat between the new and old channels. Some of the toe boarding will be removed and used in habitat elsewhere on site. New and upgraded footpaths, wildlife flower grass areas and bridge across Pyl Brook will be provided. The site is situated within the Kimpton Industrial Area and forms part of a wider proposal to create a Linear Park around the Industrial Estate. This forms part of the UDP objectives for the Industrial area and associated environmental and recreational enhancements in the area. The works are being carried out by the London Borough of Sutton. The Environment Agency have been consulted regarding the diversion and re-routing of a section of the Pyl Brook as part of the Planning Application and the Consenting process.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Services on the site are the primary constraints. These consist of a gas main and foul sewer with manhole which are restricting the alignment and depth of the new channel. In addition the catchment itself is a constraint. London Clay underlies the site and downstream sections. However as the catchment rises a transition occurs to more permeable Chalk. This combination of a permeable upper catchment and urban build up may have contributed to the flashy nature of the Pyl Brook. Therefore the scheme has to cope with low base flows and peaky responses during storm events.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anton Crescent Wetlands Regeneration, Ashlone Wharf FCRM scheme, Barn Elms Sports Ground, Barn Elms Wetland Centre, South West London, Barnes Common, Barnes Common improvements, Beverley Brook Flow control structures, Beverley Brook d/s of Rock’s Lane, Beverley Park, Cuddington Park... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|