Case study:Firs Farm Wetlands
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.
- 1 Project overview
- 2 Image gallery
- 3 Catchment and subcatchment
- 4 Site
- 5 Project background
- 6 Reasons for river restoration
- 7 Measures
- 8 Monitoring
- 9 Additional documents and videos
- 10 Additional links and references
- 11 Supplementary Information
Location: 51° 37' 42", -0° 5' 13"
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
|Project web site|
|Themes||Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban|
|Main contact forename||Ian|
|Main contact surname||Russell|
|Main contact user ID|
|Contact organisation||London Borough of Enfield|
|Contact organisation web site||http://enfield.gov.uk/|
|Partner organisations||Environment Agency, Thames Water, Greater London Authority, Thames 21, Friends of Firs Farm|
|Parent multi-site project|
| This is a parent project
encompassing the following
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Pymmes Park Wetlands
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Hydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Additional documents and videos