Case study:Abbots Worthy Restoration Project

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://https://environmentagency.blog.gov.uk/2020/10/15/winning-the-rivers-prize-2020-restoring-our-unique-chalk-streams-for-people-wildlife-and-the-environment/
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Environment
Main contact surname Agency
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Natural England
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


To restore degraded section of SSSI in line with Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy and WFD objectives through a series of well known river restoration techniques

The "Abbots Worthy Restoration Project" aims to revitalise a degraded section of a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) by implementing established river restoration methods, aligning with the principles outlined in the "Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy" and the goals of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), focusing on improving the ecological health of the river by creating more natural habitats for aquatic life through techniques like removing obstructions, re-profiling river banks, adding gravel, and planting native vegetation.

Key elements of the project: Following the Test and Itchen model: The project will draw on successful restoration techniques used in the Test and Itchen rivers, which are renowned for their chalk stream ecosystems, likely including the removal of weirs, re-meandering of the river channel, and the introduction of woody debris to create diverse habitats.

Addressing degradation: The project will identify and address the specific degradation issues within the SSSI, such as excessive erosion, lack of instream habitat complexity, and poor water quality, which could be hindering the aquatic life present.

Diverse restoration techniques:

  • Channel modifications: Reshaping the river channel to create more natural meanders and variations in water flow to mimic a healthy river system.
  • Gravel addition: Placing gravel in strategic locations to provide spawning grounds for fish species.
  • Bank stabilization: Using natural methods like planting native vegetation to stabilize eroding banks and create riparian buffers.
  • Woody debris management: Adding or strategically placing fallen trees within the river to provide shelter and complexity for aquatic organisms.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Alignment with WFD objectives/ Improving ecological status: The project aims to enhance the ecological status of the river by restoring natural habitats and improving water quality, aligning with the primary goal of the WFD.

Monitoring and evaluation: Regular monitoring of the restored area will be crucial to assess the effectiveness of the restoration activities and track changes in the aquatic ecosystem, including fish populations, macroinvertebrate communities, and plant life.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Stakeholder engagement: Collaboration with landowners, local communities, and relevant environmental agencies is essential for successful implementation and long-term management of the restored area. Overall, the Abbots Worthy Restoration Project aims to significantly improve the ecological health of a degraded SSSI section by applying well-established river restoration techniques, ultimately contributing to the wider conservation goals of the Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy and the WFD objectives.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 5' 16.75" N, 1° 17' 6.30" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 400400 m <br />0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Project started 2018/04/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 98,00098,000 k€ <br />98,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information