Case study:Greatham Marsh Restoration
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Estuary, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Matthew |
Main contact surname | Rountree |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Northumbrian Water, The Hospital of God |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Tees Estuary is one of the most heavily modified and developed estuaries in the UK, with less than 10% of the original intertidal habitats remaining. From 1740, large areas of saltmarsh have been enclosed to form freshwater grazing marsh. However, the industrialisation and systematic land take between 1830 and 1970s has resulted in significant habitat loss. It is estimated that the Tees Estuary has lost over two thirds of its intertidal habitat through waste disposal and infilling over the many years of modification, some 3,000ha, or 30km2.
The Greatham Marsh Restoration project is centred on the restoration of intertidal habitat on the low-lying agricultural land near Greatham Village. Historically, the village was on the edge of the marshes but is now inland from the remaining intertidal areas.
The land is currently protected by flood banks constructed in the 18th century and a tidal structure with tidal flaps constructed in 1980 by the former water authority. The alignment of Greatham Beck was rationalised in approximately 1981 when the original meandering tributary was infilled.
The tidal structure was constructed under a licence that expires on 30 November 2029. A condition of the licence stipulates that on the expiry of the Licence, the structure is removed and riverbanks and foreshore reinstated.
This alone would not restore the full extent of natural processes and habitats. The oversized Greatham Beck would become a deep tidal creek and the floodplain would be inundated for long periods of time as a result of historic embankments and ineffective drainage.
So the Project intends to restore the former meandering channel of Greatham Beck and the network of tidal creeks within the floodplain. Areas of higher land within the field parcel are proposed to be managed as grasslands for conservation purposes. Habitats would be allowed to migrate inland as sea level rises.
The project contributes to achievement of WFD objectives by implementing targets for WFD protected sites found within the conservation objectives of the SPA, and mitigation measures for the Tees Estuary water body.
Monitoring surveys and results
- Water quality improvements
- Biodiversity River Units
Biodiversity Area Units – including intertidal habitats and with unrestricted inland migration
Nutrient reduction in Tees catchment subject to Nutrient Neutrality advice from NE
Climate change through reduced operational carbon emissions and sequestration in habitat
SPA SSSI improvement – unfavourable declining SSSI Unit die to excess nutrients, SPA objectives to reduce nutrients and restore extend intertidal habitats
Nature based solution through increased river channel capacity
Lessons learnt
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | 2024-09-01 |
Works completed | 2025-11-01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 1000 - 5000 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 40004,000 k€ <br />4,000,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Environment Agency |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Supplementary funding information
partnership funding
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Northumbria |
---|---|
River basin | Tees |
Subcatchment
River name | Greatham Creek Catchment (trib of Tidal Tees) |
---|---|
Area category | 10 - 100 km² |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | 100 - 200 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | 149149 m <br />0.149 km <br />14,900 cm <br /> |
Dominant geology | Calcareous |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | Arable and Horticulture |
Waterbody ID | GB103025076030 |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Greatham Managed Realignment Scheme
Site
Name | Tees Estuary water body |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB510302509900 |
WFD (national) typology | TraC |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | Yes |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Estuary |
Dominant substrate | Estuarine mud |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information
Construction start date – between September 2024 and January 2025
10 months construction phase
Construction completion date – between July 2025 and November 2025
Dependent on permission and agreements
Marine Licence application submitted January 2024
Planning Permission application submitted April 2024
Landowner Agreement Heads of Terms
Partnership Contribution Agreement
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Image gallery
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
|