Case study:Watercress Farm Rewetting Project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 16:08, 19 February 2024 by Kate.miller (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 25' 44.37" N, 2° 42' 12.82" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Kate
Main contact surname Miller
Main contact user ID User:kate.miller
Contact organisation Ecosulis
Contact organisation web site http://ecosulis.co.uk
Partner organisations Belmont Estate
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


At Watercress Farm, which lies on the very northern edge of the Somerset Levels, Ecosulis worked with Belmont Estate on the creation of a new wetland. The intention was to enable the river to reclaim its former floodplain, creating a new, more sinuous path, which will deliver benefits for both people and nature. The project was designed to trap runoff sediment, pollutants and nutrients, while this degraded former arable field develops into a biodiverse wetland, supporting abundant wildlife.

Our main objectives for the Watercress Wetland creation project were to re-connect the flood plain at the Watercress Farm landholding, maximize the area of semi-permanent and ephemeral water and improve the hydro morphology and biodiversity of the Land Yeo River.

The project was set out to achieve these objectives through creation of a new 400m wetland stream and 1.74hectares of wetland scrapes, blocking existing straight/steep sided ditches, the creation of numerous ephemeral scrapes of varying sizes and shapes, and the creation of numerous areas of permanent water, either within a scrape or as backwater ponds with shallow gradients.

Between June and September 2023, Ecosulis undertook extensive transformative works, focusing on the Land Yeo River channel and its surroundings. The west side of Watercress Wood saw the elevation of water levels in the existing channel, with the creation of four clay and gravel riffle impoundments, diverting flows into a newly designed 400m optimized wetland stream. This stream, boasting various river restoration techniques, now functions as the primary channel, bypassing the re-purposed longitudinal wetland ponds.

Ten wetland scrapes, excavated into arable land on both banks of the wetland stream, offer over 7,800m² of habitat to the Land Yeo River catchment. These features, connected to the wetland stream, adjust water levels based on flow conditions. Gravels extracted on-site were used for bed dressing, bed raising, and gravel riffle installations.

Wetland scrapes upstream of Watercress Wood, both within and outside the floodplain, intercept agricultural runoff, fostering approximately 18,000m² of vital wet meadow habitat. Field ditches have been strategically plugged to maximise marshy wet meadow habitat. Spoil from wetland excavation formed butterfly banks and bunds, enhancing breeding habitat for insects and reptiles across 13,000m².

Land drains were intentionally broken or blocked to retain water on-site, mitigating runoff into the Land Yeo River and neighbouring areas. This comprehensive approach showcases a commitment to environmental restoration, providing diverse habitats while addressing water management and runoff concerns within the catchment.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The site will be monitored by Belmont’s ecology volunteer group and will act as the backdrop to their free, nature-based education programme. We will also be working alongside Belmont to continue to capture and record the impacts of site to showcase effective partnership working, to deliver long-term benefits for the local area and beyond.

During the delivery of the project, we conducted daily reporting and assessments of our works and findings, to ensure we were continuing to align with the project objectives and meeting the requirements to protect and restore local biodiversity. This included ECoWs reports, fuel logs, vehicle and machine checks, a desk -based study and contamination report, alongside daily walk-throughs to identify any potential risks and issues.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information