Case study:Bowston Weir Removal

From RESTORE
Revision as of 10:29, 6 July 2023 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 21' 51.71" N, 2° 46' 31.47" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://scrt.co.uk/what-we-do/current-projects/bowston/
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Peter
Main contact surname Evoy
Main contact user ID User:South Cumbria Rivers Trust
Contact organisation South Cumbria Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://scrt.co.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Cumbria River Restoration Strategy

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Bowston weir removal

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Bowston weir is the first weir to be removed on the River Kent Site of Special Scientific Interest and Special Area of Conservation (SSSI/SAC). Bowston weir removal forms part of the Cumbria River Restoration Strategy (CRRS) which aims to restore the three Cumbrian SSSI/SAC rivers to their natural form and function and help them achieve Favourable Condition. Additional benefits include improved migration, biodiversity net gain, improved navigation and a reduced flood risk to local residents.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


1. Baseline data includes fish surveys and other ecological parameters, topographical and bathymetrical surveys, drone surveys and walk over fluvial audits. 2. Post-removal data collection continued immediately after the weir removal to track the immediate change in river processes and hydrological conditions. 3. Continued collection and analysis following geomorphologically effective flow events has provided valuable monitoring data to identify positive changes in the river dynamics, improved sediment flux through the system, enhancement to the now varied ecosystem.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


SCRT created a Local Community Engagement Plan with local representatives which explained how, what and when we would communicate with local stakeholders and the public. This was extremely effective in setting out our engagement responsibilities and ensured a standardised approached to our communications.


Image gallery


Picture by cbec
20220704 123811.jpg
20220706-WA0009.jpg
Half removal.jpg
20220707-WA0000.jpg
20220712-WA0001.jpg
20221215 140306.jpg

File:Post flood (1).mp4

ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Kent & Leven
River basin North West

Subcatchment

River name River Kent
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Lake District Foundation - Building future environmental investment


Site

Name Bowston weir
WFD water body codes GB531207312000
WFD (national) typology Estuarine
WFD water body name River Kent
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest)
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes), Freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera), bullhead (Cottus gobio), water crowfoot (Ranunculus aquatilis), water-milfoil (Myriophyllum alterniflorum), reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 10001,000 m <br />1 km <br />100,000 cm <br />
Project started 2016/06/16
Works started 2022/06/20
Works completed 2022/07/19
Project completed 2020/09/30
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Cumbria River Restoration/European Regional Development Fund

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 5000 - 10000 k€
Stakeholder engagement and communication 1000 - 5000 k€
Works and works supervision more than 10000 k€
Post-project management and maintenance more than 10000 k€
Monitoring 5000 - 10000 k€



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Flood risk management, Navigation
Hydromorphology Continuity of sediment transport, Continuity for organisms, Freshwater flow regime, Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology Fish, Invertebrates: Diversity
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications removal of dams, Rock ramp construction
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Channel naturalisation
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Engagement with a wide range of stakeholders
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Channel pattern/planform Yes Yes Yes Yes No Improvement
Continuity of sediment transport Yes Yes Yes Yes No Improvement
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes No Improvement
Continuity for organisms No Yes No Yes No Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]] No No No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Flood risk management Yes Yes Yes Yes No Improvement
Bat Survey Yes No No No No Awaiting results
Bathymetric Survey Yes Yes Yes Yes No Improvement
general assessment of habitat quality and diversity (repeat photography) Yes No No No No Awaiting results


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information