Case study:Sunrise, River Trent, Staffordshire University

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:56, 27 April 2023 by Ascarr (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 0' 29.04" N, 2° 10' 19.13" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.erdf-sunrise.co.uk/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Mott
Main contact user ID User:Nick Mott
Contact organisation Staffordshire Wildlife Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.staffs-wildlife.org.uk/
Partner organisations Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, Environment Agency, Staffordshire University, ERDF, Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Wild Trout Trust
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Sunrise, River Trent, Victoria Ground
File:University JPG
Riparian zone restoration Sept 2020

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


A heavily engineered reach of the urban River Trent was restored to multiple channels, backwaters, ponds and exposed riverine sediments.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Baseline Geomorphology (Drone DTM & Bathymetry), Fish, Macro-invertebrate sampling, Small Mammals. Repeat surveys to measure against the baselines.

  • First records of spawning Brown Trout in urban Stoke-on-Trent.
  • Increase in Harvest Mouse nests in the riparian zone.
  • Increase in species diversity and abundance for macro-invertebrates.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


  • Water quality is still an issue with problems following heavy rain.
  • The University has now adopted this area as an extension to their nature reserve and use it as an outdoor laboratory.
  • Further reach restoration phases of works are being planned by the project partners both up and downstream.


Image gallery


Completed scheme 2020
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information