Case study:Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy 2

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:27, 17 February 2020 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 7' 51.61" N, 1° 28' 46.03" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Heb
Main contact surname Leman
Main contact user ID User:Heb leman
Contact organisation Environment Agency SSD
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Natural England
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy is a long-term project being carried out on these two world-renowned chalk streams in Hampshire. The Rivers Test and Itchen are legally protected as SSSI’s as they are two of the best remaining examples of chalk stream river types and associated habitats and species. However, condition assessments undertaken by NE of the riverine Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) units in March 2006 on the River Test and March 2010 on the River Itchen, the outcomes showed that both the SSSI’s are in unfavourable condition. The key reasons for this include historical modifications to the physical structure of the channel, banks and riparian zone. The Wildlife and Country side Act 1981 and the Water Framework Directive (WFD) require the rivers are returned to favourable condition and good ecological status, respectively. The aim of the T&I Strategy is to appraise the geomorphological condition of the rivers, identifying the condition of the rivers in relation to their ‘natural benchmark’. From this starting point river restoration, rehabilitation and conservation/ enhancement actions can take place to restore the SSSIs and bring them into favourable or unfavourable (recovering) condition. This includes the following specific objectives. 1. Determine the impacts of physical modification on the geomorphology and ecology of each river; 2. Provide an outline restoration plan for each river on a reach by reach basis; 3. Identify potential delivery mechanisms to help achieve this. The focus of any restoration project within the T&I Strategy is to ensure the condition of the habitat rather than the preservation of the species directly, with the principle being that good chalk stream habitat is more likely to support characteristic flora and fauna. Although the Strategy is primarily aimed at in-river characteristics, it’s also recognised that land management adjacent to the rivers has the potential to affect the quality of the in-river habitat and has been given due consideration to this throughout the project. The main objective of the T&I Strategy is to deliver the recommendations and aims above by working collaboratively with landowners and fishery interests. The T&I Strategy was first initiated in 2010 then due to unforeseen and tragic circumstances stopped. It was then re-started again in 2012. Given the scale of the T&I Strategy it is expected, all going well, that it will continue over the next 20-30 years.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Surveys of macroinvertebrates, macrophytes, fish communities and juvenile salmonids are conducted by the Environment Agency before and after restoration work on some reaches. In some cases River Habitat Survey, HabScore, and MORPH surveys have also been carried out. Extensive before and after surveys have also been carried out by external parties. For example, Southampton University PhD students have been monitoring some restored sites for several years (yet to be published) and Sparsholt College students have carried before and after fish surveys on the River Test. One technique used to record change has been before and after photography. Images have the power to show dramatic change between before and after completion. At one reach the Environment Agency asked anglers to complete a questionnaire which will be repeated to determine perceptions of the river before and after restoration. This is more than just a satisfaction survey, as it seeks to capture emotions and values. Feedback from land and river-owners and river keepers is crucially important to evaluating the works and shaping future schemes. To date all the flora and fauna survey work has shown the benefits of each restoration and that the goals and objectives of the strategy are being achieved.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Good communication with the numerous landowners on the Test and Itchen is key to the success of this project.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2012/10/01
Works started 2013/10/14
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency Flood Coastal Risk Management funding

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Environment Agency Heb Leman
Stakeholder engagement and communication more than 10000 k€ Environment Agency Heb Leman
Works and works supervision more than 10000 k€ Environment Agency Heb Leman
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring 1 - 10 k€

Supplementary funding information

Each Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy project is collaboratively funded 50/50 with the Environment Agency and landowners.



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology The Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy is a long-term project being carried out on these two world-renowned chalk streams in Hampshire. The Rivers Test and Itchen are legally protected as SSSI’s as they are two of the best remaining examples of chalk stream river types and associated habitats and species. HoweverProperty "Biological quality motivation" (as page type) with input value "The Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy is a long-term project being carried out on these two world-renowned chalk streams in Hampshire. The Rivers Test and Itchen are legally protected as SSSI’s as they are two of the best remaining examples of chalk stream river types and associated habitats and species. However" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process., condition assessments undertaken by NE of the riverine Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) units in March 2006 on the River Test and March 2010 on the River Itchen, the outcomes showed that both the SSSI’s are in unfavourable condition. The key reasons for this include historical modifications to the physical structure of the channel, banks and riparian zone. The Wildlife and Country side Act 1981 and the Water Framework Directive (WFD) require the rivers are returned to favourable condition and good ecological status, respectively.
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bed raising, channel narrowing, use of woody material, structure removal
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Ideally a reduction in vegetation management on the Test and Itchen by river keepers
Social measures (incl. engagement) Engagement with landowners is key to the success of this long tem project
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information