Case study:Wellow & Cam Initiative

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:02, 16 February 2019 by Simon Hunter (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 19' 24.94" N, 2° 22' 28.24" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Simon
Main contact surname Hunter
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Bristol Avon Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.bristolavonriverstrust.org/
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


On 2nd February 2013, a slurry incident along the Wellow Brook in Somerset caused a major fish kill and was reported by the Environment Agency as one of the worst pollution events in many years. The Wellow Brook has been designated a score of ‘Poor’ and the Cam Brook ‘Moderate’ in 2016 under the European Water Framework Directive (WFD).

From a small donation of £5,000 for the Enforcement Undertaking, BART has raised over £100,000 towards the project to date. BART has delivered the following:

Habitat assessments along the length of the Wellow and much of the Cam.

Mapped all barriers along the Wellow.

The removal of three boulder weirs that were impounding flows and smothering potential spawning substrate with sediment throughout ~8km reach.

Removal of 1 small weir and re-profiling of 2 boulder weirs in the lower Cam Brook

Pre-feasibility assessments for a large weir at the confluence of the Wellow Brook

Pre-feasibility assessments for a ford which is presenting a barrier to fish on the Wellow Brook

SNIFFER fish passage assessments on 3 weirs in the urban section of the Wellow

~20km of habitat improvements with LWD and coppicing

A successful partnership project with Midsomer Norton Town Council to improve a section of river which has now been turned into a Local Nature Reserve.

3 Riverfly monitors monitoring the Wellow on a monthly basis as well as several more BART Beacons

A pre-barrier removal electrofishing survey which we will aim to follow up with a further survey shortly to assess ongoing improvements in future years

The creation of a Friends of river group with Shoscombe Parish Council

Riparian fencing and buffer strip creation on the Cam Brook and Norton Brook

The installation of formalised cattle drinking areas to reduce poaching on the Cam Brook and Norton Brook

A programme of coppicing and LWD along a 2km reach of the Cam Brook

Strategic discussions with the Environment Agency about removing a redundant asset as a result of opening up the river to this point via BART’s work to date.

Engagement with over 250 local people, through river sessions, ‘Yellowfish’ antipollution projects and public talks.

Several litter picks, including a recent one where over 200 plastic bottles were removed and turned into a plastic fish which has attended many local events

A Challenges and Opportunities report outlining key issues and potential work-packages throughout the Wellow & Cam Brooks.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Further monitoring will be needed to deduce the level of improvements resulting from our works. However, as a start, BART note the following:

Electrofishing surveys at 5 sites along the Wellow Brook (pre-barrier removal and woody habitat installation)

Visibly improved flow diversity – levels dropped by 0.5 metres and new gravel bars and riffles exposed

Visibly reduced sedimentation of the riverbed in the weir removal project areas which will result in improved spawning potential in the coming years.

Local angling club feedback: “Mayflies absolutely off the chart at the moment, free rising trout and a squadron of ducklings in the background at the end of the clip. Heaven. The Wellow is having a super year @Bristol Avon Rivers Trust thanks for all the in-river improvements, they really seem to be having an impact!”

We have had a huge amount of positive feedback from our engagement sessions, including: “Thank you … it was a brilliant day. All the staff are now talking about taking their classes down to the river back and feeling more confident about the activity. The children learnt a lot about the creatures living in their local river and the parents thought it was a really well organised event.”

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Riffle establishing after weir removal.jpg
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information