Case study:River Rhee

From RESTORE
Revision as of 16:48, 2 January 2019 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 6' 44.25" N, 0° 4' 17.70" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country England
Main contact forename Martin
Main contact surname Janes
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The restored Rhee, rich in plant life in the summer of 2006

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Prior to the restoration works, the River Rhee was a typical example of a degraded lowland agricultural river. The river, a base fed brook, had become lost in its channel and was suffering severe siltation problems. Also, the populations of wild brown trout had been in a state of decline.

The restoration project aimed to increase velocities to allow scour and maintain a central, silt-free channel, diversifying the habitat whilst ensuring there was no increase in flood risk. This was achieved through re-grading of the bank to create a shelf as an aquatic plant habitat and a spawning area for a number of fish species. The shelf also narrowed the channel, increasing flow and clearing silt. Stretches of the river were also re-meandered to further diversify flow and, on existing bends, wetlands were created on the inside bend to provide a new habitat. Finally, a backwater was created to provide fish with a refuge during high flows, and habitat for fish fry and invertebrates.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


The created backwater, April 2004
The entrance to the backwater
The created shelf, mid-construction. See the narrowing of the river. August 2008
Willow bundles and coir fibre rolls, June 2006
Willow bundles and coir fibre rolls, June 2006
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Anglian
River basin Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level)

Subcatchment

River name Mill River
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 167167 m <br />0.167 km <br />16,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB105033038030



Site

Name River Rhee at Wendy
WFD water body codes GB105033038030
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Mill River
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 2000 m2 km <br />200,000 cm <br />
Project started 2001/09/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2002/09/30
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 19 k€19,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Continuity of sediment transport
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank reprofiling
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of backwaters
Planform / Channel pattern Channel narrowing, Adding sinuosity, Creation of meanders
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/p1494.pdf River Restoration Case Study

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information