Case study:Waldringfield Flood Defence Scheme, Suffolk

From RESTORE
Revision as of 15:44, 8 November 2018 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 3' 14.85" N, 1° 19' 49.22" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/58_waldringfield.pdf
Themes
Country England
Main contact forename Karen
Main contact surname Thomas
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Water Management Alliance
Contact organisation web site http://www.wlma.org.uk/
Partner organisations Waldringfield Flood Defence Group, East Suffolk Internal Drainage Board, Environment Agency
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Following the tidal surge of December 2013, the businesses and residents of Waldringfield in Suffolk (Map 1) formed the Waldringfield Flood Defence Group. Working with the East Suffolk Internal Drainage Board, the Group has achieved a more resilient flood defence for the community along 1km of estuary frontage. The Group raised funds through the Coastal Communities Fund and other funding routes to pay for the works. The work began in February 2015 and consisted of 2 phases. Phase 1 (south section) involved raising the brick wall to protect village properties fronting the estuary, along with a counterwall to separate this part of the flood cell from the north section. Phase 2 (north section) involved raising and widening the clay embankment together with saltmarsh restoration. The Phase 2 design and build project aimed to create a higher wall, with a wider crest width and gentle back slope to withstand overtopping and breaching in the future. In addition, by winning all the material from the farmland behind the wall, a new freshwater wetland was created. This wetland provided delivered suitable alternative habitat for water voles within a year of its construction. The East Suffolk Internal Drainage Board also designed and delivered a saltmarsh restoration pilot as part of the scheme to add further natural flood protection to the wall. The project was officially launched on 1 December 2015 and has been praised locally as a great model of partnership working. This project is a demonstration of what can be achieved at relatively low cost on rural flood defences. Through a partnership approach incorporating both traditional and working with natural processes (WWNP) measures, significant improvements have been made to flood risk management for approximately 20 properties and a well-used public footpath, along with the creation of freshwater habitat and restoration of saltmarsh. Early monitoring results demonstrate that simple and relatively inexpensive brushwood structures can increase sediment accumulation within areas of eroded saltmarsh, providing benefits to both flood defence and habitat.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Deben Estuary
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2015
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) £1.6m"£" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Coastal Communities Fund, Flood Defence Grant-in-Aid, Waldringfield Flood Defence Group

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood and coastal erosion protection
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information