Case study:Mill Brook, Tattenhall, Cheshire

From RESTORE
Revision as of 11:45, 1 November 2018 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 7' 10.62" N, 2° 46' 3.67" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/7_millbrook.pdf
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits
Country England
Main contact forename Duncan
Main contact surname Revell
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Bolesworth Estate, Tattenhall Wildlife Group
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This was a habitat creation scheme (Photo 1) which incorporated innovative, Natural Flood Management (NFM) techniques along 230m of Mill Brook, upstream of Tattenhall near Chester (Map 1). This partnership project with the Bolesworth Estate and Tattenhall Wildlife Group created 1.5ha of priority reedbed and wet grassland habitats within a new excavated floodplain area. The project helps attenuate flood peaks and reduces risk downstream in Tattenhall. The North West Regional Flood and Coastal Committee allocated £13,500 of funding to this scheme from the North West 'Slowing the Flow' project. Key facts: 1.5ha of priority habitats created, wider and improved riparian zone and wildlife corridor: reduced diffuse agricultural pollution leading to reduced sediment input and improved water quality: helping to meet Water Framework Directive objectives; increased floodwater storage upstream and flood peak attenuation, which slows the flow of the brook, leading to some flood risk reduction benefits to the downstream village of Tattenhall

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information