Case study:River Glaven, North Norfolk

From RESTORE
Revision as of 11:20, 1 November 2018 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 52' 53.04" N, 1° 3' 57.45" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/5_glaven.pdf
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring
Country England
Main contact forename Mark
Main contact surname Wilkinson
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation James Hutton Institute
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.hutton.ac.uk/
Partner organisations River Glaven Conservation Group, Wild Trout Trust, University College London, Queen Mary University of London, Environment Agency, Richard Hey, local farmers and landowners, Natural England, Norfolk Wildlife Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Glaven in north Norfolk has been historically modified, for example, through the creation of water mills. Coupled with this, widespread dredging has occurred and flood embankments have been created to protect agricultural land. The project's objectives were to improve the river corridor habitat by restoring river processes and reconnect the river and its floodplain and to develop an experience base that would serve the River Glaven Conservation Group (RGCG) well on other projects. The project provides a unique opportunity to monitor and model river and floodplain interactions. A MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 coupled hydrological/hydraulic model was employed to assess the impact of floodplain reconnection. Using data from 2007 to 2010, the study found that the removal of the embankment permitted widespread inundation of the floodplain at high flows (>1.7m3s-1) as well as enhancing flooding of the immediate riparian area during lower magnitude events. Removal of embankments has found to have reduced the channel capacity by approximately 60%, suggesting that overbank flooding was the most dramatic hydrological effect following the restoration project (Clilverd et al. 2013).

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Glaven
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2009
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information