Case study:Southington River Restoration Project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:20, 20 February 2018 by Heb leman (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 14' 41.51" N, 1° 16' 16.57" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Spatial planning, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Heb
Main contact surname Leman
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency SSD
Contact organisation web site http://.gov.uk
Partner organisations Natural England
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Image showing location of removed structure and newly improved surrounding area

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Removal of a historic impounding structure on the River Test at Overton and the restoration of 400m of channel upstream. The reach include x2 crescent rock ramps to retain the head and spread it over a longer distance.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


There was no official monitoring at this site.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


No real lessons. Just make sure you get it right before you start.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 400m0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Project started 2017/06/01
Works started 2017/09/20
Works completed 2017/12/21
Project completed 2017/12/21
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Test and Itchen River Restoration Strategy and landowner contribution

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication 50 - 100 k€ Environment Agency Heb Leman
Works and works supervision Environment Agency Heb Leman
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure The River Test is one of the best examples of a Chalk River in England supporting diverse plant and wildlife species. As such, it is designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information