Case study:Sharnberry Mine: Abandoned Metal Mines

From RESTORE
Revision as of 09:58, 24 May 2017 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 54° 39' 30.86" N, 1° 55' 56.85" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Hugh
Main contact surname Potter
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations The Coal Authority (UK)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Adit at Sharnberry mine

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Sharnberry mine is at the far eastern edge of the North Pennine orefield, in the Pennine Moors between the River Wear and River Tees. The mine was worked for Fluorspar until it closed in 1982, leaving spoil deposits and an adit which discharges to the Euden Beck - a tributary of the Bedburn Beck and River Wear.

Our routine monitoring found there were high levels of zinc in the Bedburn Beck where it joins the River Wear. These high zinc levels exceed the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for the Bedburn Beck, meaning that the watercourse (four water bodies) isn't achieving the 'good status' for water quality that is set out in our Northumbria River Basin Plan. We discovered that the Sharnberry Mine Adit is the main source of the zinc and other heavy metals such as cadmium and lead, and is discharging these pollutants into the Euden Beck and causing pollution up to 15 km downstream in the Bedburn Beck. We recently carried out an ecological survey of the Euden Beck and found the aquatic life was suffering as a result of these heavy metals, which can settle in river sediments.

We're continuing to investigate and monitor the water quality in the Bedburn Beck and its tributaries, and we've set up a partnership with the Coal Authority and the North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Partnership (AONB) to look at options for removing the metals from the Sharnberry mine discharge to improve the water quality of the surrounding watercourses. Newcastle University are carrying out trials of treatment technologies which we could use to remove the heavy metals from the Sharnberry mine discharge, preventing the problem at the source and helping the Bedburn Beck to meet the EQS and return to 'good' ecological status.

Euden Beck and Bedburn Beck both fail their EQS for zinc. Immediately downstream of the mine the zinc concentrations are up to 110 times the EQS. Fifteen kilometres downstream of the mine in the Bedburn Beck, zinc is five times the EQS.
In times of low flow the Sharnberry mine is contributing more zinc than reaches the River Wear, indicating metals are being retained in the river sediments.
When the river flows increase, a greater load of metals reaches the end of the catchment. Additional metals are being washed in with rainfall from spoil deposits and from mobilising the metals previously retained within the river sediments.
Treatment of the mine discharge to remove the metals could enable 15km of river to pass the EQS and four waterbodies to be returned to good ecological status.

Impact of the minewater discharge:

15km length of watercourse affected (four water bodies)
Average metal concentration of Zinc = 1.8 mg/l, Cadmium = 3.2 ug/l
Average flow is 12 l/sec
Load of zinc discharged per annum = 700 kg
Water body ecological status/potential is Moderate

Benefits of remediation

The River Wear will be protected from a major pollution source
We're developing partnerships with important stakeholders and using our position as an influential advisor to deliver shared environmental outcomes
Contribute towards WFD Good Ecological status compliance in four waterbodies
700kg of zinc would be prevented from entering R Wear every year

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Northumbria
River basin Wear

Subcatchment

River name Bedburn Beck from Source to Euden Beck
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 485485 m <br />0.485 km <br />48,500 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Coniferous Woodland
Waterbody ID GB103024072700



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB103024072700
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Bedburn Beck from Source to Euden Beck
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Heavy metals in channel
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Catchment Characterisation Programme to investigate water pollution from abandoned metal mines and determine remediation options of metal pollution, Options for remediation, Remediation Treatment, reviewed treatment technologies, Prevent problem at source
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Ecological survey, Survey work


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information