Case study:River Soar fish refuge and wetland scrape

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:35, 2 March 2016 by Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 42' 59.96" N, 1° 7' 9.46" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Swati
Main contact surname Nettleship
Main contact user ID User:Jfreeborough
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This was a partnership project to create a fish refuge at Cossington Meadows, to boost the number of fish in the River Soar and thereby improve its ecological condition. Additional biodiversity benefits were achieved by the creation of a wetland scrape.

Significant modification of the River Soar by dredging and straightening to aid drainage and navigation has resulted in a loss of floodplain connectivity. This has lead to a loss of backwaters and other wetland habitats which in turn has impacted the species that rely on those habitats to survive.

WFD failures in the River Soar have been partially attributed to a lack of suitable fish habitat. Creation of a fish refuge area is expected to contribute towards improvements in the Fish element.

The EA and LRWT plan to continue to deliver improvements in WFD and provide wider biodiversity benefits.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The wetland scrape has created 0.8 hectares of priority habitat and expected to attract additional priority species.

Successfully created new habitats that will have an immediate ecological benefit to the overall biodiversity of the site. Interpretation boards placed along the public footpath adjacent to the site will help to inform the wider community about the habitats created and why this work is so important.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Ensure that all soil testing is undertaken months ahead of any scheduled groundwork.


Image gallery


Before works
During works
After work's completed
River Soar scrape.jpg
River Soar fish refuge after1.jpg
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Humber
River basin Soar

Subcatchment

River name River Soar from Rothley Brook to Long Whatton Brook
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 230230 m <br />0.23 km <br />23,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB104028047211



Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB104028047211
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name River Soar from Rothley Brook to Long Whatton Brook
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2013/2014"2013/2014" contains a sequence that could not be interpreted against an available match matrix for date components.
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information