Case study:Wandle River Restoration Project: Hackbridge
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Tim |
Main contact surname | Longstaff |
Main contact user ID | User:Pollygwenbryant |
Contact organisation | Wandle Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wandletrust.org |
Partner organisations | Defra Catchment Restoration Fund, Environment Agency, Rydon's Construction, Living Wandle Landscape Partnership |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project is one of four sites delivered through the Defra Catchment Restoration Fund.
Designs were developed based on detailed 2D flood modelling undertaken in conjunction with cbec eco-engineering. Practical works were delivered during Summer 2014 with appointed contractors, Cain Bioengineering.
The work started with the removal of old toe-boarding from around the edge of Culvers Island. The island was re-profiled with a new bank line created using hazel faggot bundles secured with chestnut stakes and backed with coir netting. Sediment from the channel was then placed behind the new bank line.
The weir structures either side of the island were removed and the river channel narrowed using a combination of chestnut posts and hazel faggot bundles or gabion stone.
A causeway was built to create a backwater pond area using coir geotextile layered over a bed of stone and weighed down with gravel and sediment and planted with aquatic plants. The new island banks were re-graded to create a gradually sloped bank to which a variety of aquatic vegetation was planted with a team of 60 volunteers over three days.
Variations in depth, width and the introduction of gravel, small boulders and Large Woody Debris have all provided a diversity of habitats and increased the flow diversity of the channel throughout the site.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Challenges:
- Very urban nature of the site. Complex flood modelling and design was required.
- Multiple underground utilities which had to be identified and avoided during the works.
- Many and varied stakeholder needs and opinions.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Butter Hill Phase 2, River Wandle Restoration Project, River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 1, River Wandle: Silt & SuDs
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|