Case study:Fishery/habitat enhancement on the Grand Union Canal

From RESTORE
Revision as of 10:42, 27 October 2015 by Hazel Wilson (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 37' 1.72" N, 0° 29' 46.88" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Stewart
Main contact surname Pomeroy
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Groundwork London
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations British Waterways, Environment Agency, London Wildlife Trust, Angling Society
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
A new backwater

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Creation of a backwater of variable depth and gentle sloping margins. enhancements for fishery and wildlife. Silted up, heavily shaded. Unused part of a farm adjacent to the canal.
Funding secured and commitment to deliver - August 2010 (LRAP update). Good replication potential.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Pre-project data

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Thames
River basin Colne

Subcatchment

River name Colne and GUC (from confluence with Chess to Ash)
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m) 181181 m <br />0.181 km <br />18,100 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Improved grassland
Waterbody ID GB106039023090



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Colne Brook, Habitat Improvements on the River Colne at West Drayton, Uxbridge Moor Backwater


Site

Name
WFD water body codes GB106039023090
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Colne and GUC (from confluence with Chess to Ash)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 100 m0.1 km <br />10,000 cm <br />
Project started 2010/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2014/03/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Private Company

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Creation of backwater
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information