Case study:River restoration on the River Brett at Shelley

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:31, 24 November 2014 by Tbond (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 2' 4.85" N, 0° 57' 32.71" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Trevor
Main contact surname Bond
Main contact user ID User:Tbond
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations Dedham Vale AONB, Suffolk Wildlife Trust
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Rehabilitation of the River Brett at Shelley, Suffolk

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Gravel shoulders created using material excavated from a newly created pool. Note how the flow is visibly quicker where the channel is constricted by the gravel features.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


A river restoration project driven by a lack of morphological diversity on the River Brett between Layham and Hadleigh. The project involved the transformation of a straight, uniform, steeply embanked, trapezoidal river channel into a morphologically diverse, oxygenated and habitat-rich river channel. Key improvements made to the river here include increased floodplain connectivity, greater variety in channel depth and width and enhanced flow velocities (to accelerate geomorphic change).

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


An elongated berm feature on the River Brett near Layham
Berm feature incorporating a 'scrape' feature
A berm feature immediately after construction. This photograph is looking upstream from the true right-hand bank on the River Brett
Matt Holden from the Dedham Vale AONB overseeing the creation of one of our berms
Mitigation work prior to the start of the project included searching for evidence of water vole burrows
This great green bush cricket was found on-site
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name The River Brett at Layham
WFD water body codes GB105036040930
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name River Brett
Pre-project morphology Straightened
Reference morphology Straightened
Desired post project morphology Sinuous
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations None
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Water Vole
Dominant hydrology Groundwater
Dominant substrate Silt, Sand, Clay
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 1 - 10 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category Less than 0.001
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information