Case study:Little Waltham Meadows Back Channel creation
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Kieren |
Main contact surname | Alexander |
Main contact user ID | User:KierenAlexander |
Contact organisation | Essex Wildlife Trust |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.essexwt.org.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This is a multi-pronged project aimed at improving in channel morphological diversity, reducing diffuse pollution and sedimentation entering the main river Chelmer and Provide improvements to the riparian habitats and enhance the resilience of the wet woodland.
Funded by the Catchment restoration fund, as part of the Essex Healthy headwaters scheme, the earthworks will take place in late Summer, early Autumn 2014.
This aims of the project will be achieved by creating a new 280 backwater channel to provide refuges for fish and Macrophytes during high flow events. This will also enhance habitat variability by creating additional space for emergent vegetation and new bank side vegetation. An existing land drain which currently feeds directly into the Chelmer will be redirected to feed into two new settlement ponds which will filter out the diffuse pollution by a method of delay, settle out and filter. This land drain will then feed into the new backwater channel.
Additional habitat will be created by installing a new sluice to re-wet an existing piece of woodland to historical levels. Extra woodland will be planted on the river side to create shading of the river and the new channel. Water to the new back channel will be controlled via a new water control structure, maintaining the flows of the River Chelmer.
Monitoring surveys and results
Monitoring of water quality in the nearby Chelmer is underway. As is monitoring of vegetation in the back channel and bay.
Lessons learnt
For the wet woodland enhancement, sometimes the simplest solution is the easiest. The drop board sluice has a habit of leaking and it may be that a simple clay bund with a a pipe and 90 degree collar may have sufficed.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|