Case study:River Tarrant Rehabilitation Project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:32, 13 October 2014 by JoshRRC (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 53' 8.71" N, 2° 4' 58.11" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Sarah
Main contact surname Guest
Main contact user ID User:RachelM
Contact organisation EA
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Tarrant Monkton

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Photo and map showing location of works

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


A very uniform 500m section of the Tarrant, with extremely limited existing habitat diversity, was modified using a number of different techniques. The main work involved re-profiling the bed to create some variation in long and cross-section. No re-profiling of banks was undertaken, nor did the work involve any land-take. In the upstream sub-sections A-B live willow logs/stakes were also installed into the river or up the bank slopes in specific locations.

The physical modifications of re-distributing bed material around, installing log deflectors and occasional short stake to form pollards, was completed in just over two days. Work was completed within four days by wiring down firmly each of the installed willow logs and cutting pinning stakes back to log height.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Monitoring was completed before works to detirmine where works should be focused. Monitoring was also completed after the works to establish how successful the project had been.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Approximate locations for different rehabilitation measures
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 429.7429.7 m <br />0.43 km <br />42,970 cm <br />
Project started
Works started 2013/07/22
Works completed 2013/07/25
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology uniform channel
Biology limited habitat diversity
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications bed reprofiling, and branch cuttings of willow and aquatic plants for its stabilization
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern flow deflectors
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information