Case study:Arborfield nature like bypass and weirs project

4.50

(2 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 51° 24' 19.55" N, 0° 55' 42.70" W

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Arborfield nature like bypass and weirs project\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Habitat and biodiversity\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Arborfield nature like bypass and weirs project","link":"","lat":51.408040376161,"lon":-0.92426776885986,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country	England
Main contact forename	Dominic
Main contact surname	Martyn
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site	http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

One of the five weir structures to be lowered during the project - pre-works. Courtesy of Wild Trout Trust and the Environment Agency.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

In this reach, impassable flow control structures impounded the river by 1.4m, for over 4km upstream. WFD fisheries surveys determined moderate to poor ecological status upstream of the structures, with good ecological status downstream.

Project objectives to improve WFD status upstream of weir structures from 'moderate' to 'good', along with flood alleviation. Works involved lowering of 5 structures along an 800m section of river, construction of a 200m nature-like bypass channel, in addition to two backwaters and creation of 80m of new riffle habitat for spawning.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment

Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Site

Edit site

Name	Loddon at Arborfield
WFD water body codes	GB106039023160
WFD (national) typology	Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name	Loddon (Swallowfield to River Thames confluence)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body	No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present	No
Invasive species present	No
Species of interest	Target fish species: sea trout, eels, dace, barbel, chub, roach, bullhead, lamprey and pike.
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)

Project background

Edit project background

Reach length directly affected (m)	800m0.8 km <br />80,000 cm <br />
Project started	2010/06/30
Works started
Works completed	2011/07/06
Project completed
Total cost category	more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€)	~596"~" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources	DEFRA, Environment Agency FCRM and Fisheries, Thames Water, Barbel Society

Cost for project phases

Phase	cost category	cost exact (k€)	Lead organisation	Contact forename	Contact surname
Investigation and design	100 - 500 k€	120120 k€ <br />120,000 € <br />
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision	100 - 500 k€	~450"~" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring	10 - 50 k€	2424 k€ <br />24,000 € <br />

Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology	Weirs preventing fish passage upstream.
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project	Flood mitigation.

Measures

Edit Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications	Creation of 80m of (riffle habitat) spawning gravels.
Floodplain / River corridor	Thames Water weir lowering and repair work to four out of five structures - to lower upstream water levels and reduce overbank flow frequency.
Planform / Channel pattern	Construction of 200m weir bypass channel to create free fish migration status. Two backwater areas created towards the end of the bypass channel and directly downstream of its exit.
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other	Presentations and meetings with local citizens. Volunteers involved in construction and future management of project.

Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Channel pattern/planform	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Awaiting results
Quantity & dynamics of flow	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Fish	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Awaiting results
Invertebrates	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Awaiting results
Macrophytes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Habitat mapping	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Awaiting results

Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Additional links and references

Edit links and references

Link	Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

Post-project ecological/hydromorphological monitoring assessments during 2011/12. Data should be available during 2012.