Case study:The Axe and Exe River Improvement Project (AERIP)

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:21, 22 April 2014 by Ivo (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 54' 8.60" N, 3° 29' 25.39" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename John
Main contact surname Hickey
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Westcountry Rivers Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.wrt.org.uk/
Partner organisations River Exe and Tributaries Association, Axe Vale Rivers Association, Environment Agency, South West Water, Exe Mitigation Group, River Exe Foundation, Exmoor National Park, Forestry Commission, Natural England, East Devon AONB, Dorset AONB, South West Rivers Association
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Axe and Exe River Improvement Project (AERIP) is a partnership project using Catchment Restora-tion Funds to undertake river catchment restoration on the Axe and Exe. The partnership, led by the Westcountry Rivers Trust, has been carrying out river restoration and undertaking works to address the causes of Water Framework Directive issues for many years. Through restoration work the project will address issues including: barriers to fish migration, preventing fish from reaching their natural spawning grounds; diffuse pollution, the run-off of soil and nutrients which cause damage to spawning grounds and a negative impact on the wider river ecology;interrupted conveyance of river gravels reducing the spawning habitat for trout and salmon; degraded river corridor habitat, including the impacts from abandoned tree coppice and excessively eroded and poached riverbanks damaged by stock access.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district South West
River basin East Devon

Subcatchment

River name Lower Axe
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 224224 m <br />0.224 km <br />22,400 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Arable and Horticulture
Waterbody ID GB108045008870



Site

Name Axe and Exe Catchments
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 500 - 1000 k€
Total cost (k€) 800800 k€ <br />800,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Catchment Restoration Funds

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Pollution incident
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Economic, Social, Climate change mitigation


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Marginal planting, Gravel augmentation
Floodplain / River corridor Track creation for sediment traps
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information